home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- >>And to say Win95 runs on top of DOS. You don't know much about the
- >>system your insulting do you?
- >I think I'll put in my two cents here...
- >I used a copy of Windows 95 here at home for about 5 weeks all told,
- >running in parallel with my FAT-based OS/2 Warp setup on my DX4/100
- ....
- >However: while Windows 95 may not literally be running on top of DOS
- >(and this is a highly debatable point, BTW, since well-known authors
- >and even major publications like PC Week say it does), it still feels
-
- My experiment:
- 1 IBM PC-DOS 7 Boot disk, with memory managers, etc
- 1 Win95 system
-
- I loaded Win95 by typing "win" from the PC-DOS 7 command prompt (AUTOEXEC did
- have windows in the path) ... Sort of conclusive, eh?
- ---------------------------------------------------
- Pat Gunn, of Team OS/2, Libertarian party, and the Internet.
- "And thus came the great god known as Emacs, and with him
- came Neko, the forgotten one"
- Geek Code Follows:
- GCS d(+) s+(++):--(-) a? C++(+++)$>$ ULX++>$ P+ L++(+++)>$ E(+) W++ N++ o--? K-- w--- O++(+++)
- M+ V-- PS+++ PE++ Y+(++) PGP-- t++(+++) 5+ X R+(++) tv b+++ DI-- D++(+++) G(++) e-() h(+) r-- y-*
- ------------------------------------------------
-
-
-