home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- On 18 Apr 1996, Adam J. Thornton wrote:
-
- > In article <KOSOWSKY.96Apr18142715@bellini.harvard.edu>,
- > Jeffrey J. Kosowsky <kosowsky@bellini.harvard.edu> wrote:
- > >So, for my purposes at least, better PostScript printing is a very
- > >high priority.
- >
- > If you can get Executor to give you a .PS file, what's wrong with running
- > ghostscript (which is free) under Linux to print? Install gs and one of
- > the magic-filter programs and it'll work, or at least it does for me.
-
- Well, that's useless if the .PS file generated by executor is incorrect.
- Try printing any font above 20pt in MS Word 5.1a. Only the first letter
- shows up. I don't know if it works for you, but it doesn't for me. Also,
- I don't know if my gs is setup incorrectly, but output through gs looks
- pretty crappy at 600dpi even with genuine Adobe type 1 fonts. It's not
- matter of it will work, but how well it works.
-
- -Hyung-song Nam
- hn16@cornell.edu
-
-
-