home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- According to the benchmark program included with Executor 1.99q/2.0b0,
- Executor v2 beta 0 runs just under four times as fast as Executor 1.99q.
- However, most of you report slower performance with v2 beta 0. Can
- someone explain why.
-
- My system configuration:
-
- AMD 486DX2-80 w/ 128K cache
- 20M RAM
- ATI Mach32 VESA Local-bus video
-
- Windows 95
- Univbe 5.1
-
- And I'm running Executor (both 1.99q/2beta0) under Windows 95 DOS prompt.
-
- :->
- Rick
-
- PS. don't hit reply, instead send your reply to rick.ho@utoronto.ca
-
-