home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- >>>>> "Bill" == WCB4 <WCB4@aol.com> writes:
- In article <960408231831_465444340@emout10.mail.aol.com> WCB4@aol.com writes:
-
-
- Bill> My wife recently purchased Executor to run a few mac
- Bill> programs that she needs to, so of course I have been playing
- Bill> around with it, and found that Virtus VRML works quite well
- Bill> under executor, in fact, the mac version under executor runs
- Bill> significantly faster that the windows version does so here
-
- That is strange but neat. You may want to contact Virtus and let them
- know (make sure you give them instructions on how they can verify it
- for themselves, since they'll think you're a crank).
-
- Bill> is what I propose.
-
- Bill> I have been putting up message posting boards using html
- Bill> anfd cgi scripts (see www.upx.net/tech) and would have no
- Bill> problem setting up a threaded message board that users could
- Bill> access via the web just to post programs and their
- Bill> compatibilty status with executor. I know that the folx at
- Bill> ARDI are very busy, so I am offering to make a site that
- Bill> will be the "official" compatibility board for executor if
- Bill> it is so desired. The board interface is very clean and I
- Bill> can tailor it to pretty much do whatever the folks at ARDI
- Bill> would like to see in the board.
-
- Jered Floyd is already doing this on vorlon.mit.edu in an unofficial
- capacity. He might (I can't speak for him; he's a way busy MIT
- student) be interested in some help. We've just requested a
- fractional T1 link; we're planning on greatly expanding www.ardi.com.
-
- Bill> I have been apporached by at least one other potential user
- Bill> of executor who thinks this is a hell of an idea, and since
- Bill> my wife now owns a registered copy, I figure I can do
- Bill> something to contribute since I have been playing with it
- Bill> too.
-
- A database of what runs and what doesn't (and how thoroughly the apps
- have been tested) is definitely needed. We're currently fixing a
- bunch of known problems in beta0 and waiting for the beta0 recipients
- (and people who have downloaded the beta0 DEMO version) to send us
- more problem reports.
-
- When beta1 comes out working on such a database will be our highest
- non-emergency priority.
-
- Bill> Please respond to me via direct e-mail to wcb4@upx.net, not
- Bill> as a response to this post, as I seldom check my mail from
- Bill> my AOL account, but check just about every day from
- Bill> upx.net. One official note from within ARDI, and the site
- Bill> will be up the next day.
-
- I've responded to both. Since your offer was made in the public, I
- wanted to make sure people saw that we are interested although we'd
- prefer the existing work at vorlon to be incorporated.
-
- Bill> Later, Bill/wcb4@upx.net
-
- Thank you for this fine offer.
-
- --Cliff
- ctm@ardi.com
-
-