home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Without trying to belittle the sender, I need to point out that the
- differences between running on DOS and in a native 32bit environment like
- Win95/NT/OS/2 are so vast as to stagger the reader when a comment like this
- one is made. The Win95 installed user base is growing at an astronomical
- rate. A true Win95 (and I do hope also an OS/2) native port will allow
- features and abilities well beyond the current ones and will be a MAJOR factor
- in the impulse purchase buying of the general public. And from there, it will
- be a shorter (although still arduous) task to enable the nativeMacOS
- functionality. ARDI has great vision, true commitment, and is headed in the
- right direction. I would not have written this except that I think ARDI from
- time to time needs to receive encouragement for their vision as well as their
- products.
-
- ----------
- From: owner-executor@ardi.com on behalf of PurdyM
- Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 1996 8:02 AM
- To: executor@ardi.com
- Subject: Let's get System 7.x on top!
-
- I'm disappointed in the idea that E3 will still not allow the true MacOS
- to be placed on top of it. If ARDI is planning a Win95 specific version,
- that could be AFTER the MacOS can be placed on top...it just seems that
- the DOS version is fine for Win95 and more folks might like to use System
- 7.5 before the Win95 version...
-
- Mike
-
-
-