home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- In article <4jaj9l$jok@cnn.Princeton.EDU>, adam@flagstaff.princeton.edu (Adam J. Thornton) writes:
- |> From: adam@flagstaff.princeton.edu (Adam J. Thornton)
- |> Newsgroups: comp.emulators.mac.executor
- |> Subject: Re: MacDoom???
- |> Date: 27 Mar 1996 05:21:57 GMT
- |> Organization: Princeton University
- |> Lines: 20
- |> Message-ID: <4jaj9l$jok@cnn.Princeton.EDU>
- |> References: <199603262346.RAA05127@raven.ots.utexas.edu>
- |> NNTP-Posting-Host: flagstaff.princeton.edu
- |>
- |> In article <199603262346.RAA05127@raven.ots.utexas.edu>,
- |> <osiris@cs.utexas.edu> wrote:
- |> >>>>>> "N" == Naveen G Rao <ngr@cs.duke.edu> writes:
- |> >N> I just can't see why you would want to even run on MacDoom on a PC!
- |> >N> i guess it is kind of cool just to see if you can get it to work...
- |> >Not that I know why the original poster wanted to run MacDOOM on a PC,
- |> >but how about the following:
- |>
- |> Well, wasn't Doom developed on a NeXT? Surely there's a NeXT version. And
- YES!! v1.2 of Doom (with nightmare) came out first. It ran, and it ran very
- well.
-
-
- |> I *know* there are two Linux versions, and if you don't mind not having
- |> music, the Linux-SVGAlib version is actually faster than the DOS version.
- |>
- |> But I suspect the reason to run MacDoom is, indeed, "It'd be cool."
- |>
- |> Adam
- |> --
- |> adam@phoenix.princeton.edu | Viva HEGGA! | Save the choad! | 64,928 | Fnord
- |> "Double integral is also the shape of lovers curled asleep":Pynchon | Linux
- |> Thanks for letting me rearrange the chemicals in your head. | Team OS/2
- |> You can have my PGP passphrase when you pry it from my cold, dead brain.
-
-