home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Dear Folks,
-
- Unfortunately, we can't put a time-limited-only version of Executor
- out on the archives. Our reasoning will make sense to some of you,
- but will seem awfully strange to others, but it's true.
-
- The problem is that ARDI's purpose is to do Mac compatibility in
- general, including both emulators for machines with their own
- operating systems (NeXTs, Suns, IBM-PCs and clones) and ROMs for Mac
- clones. If you're familiar with the Mac clone market and the Mac
- emulator market, you're aware that the existing "clones" and
- "emulators" require Mac ROMs to work. There's the rub; if we release
- a time-limited-only version of Executor, then people could make
- emulators that require our time-limited-only version of Executor
- instead of Mac ROMs.
-
- This may not seem very probable to you, but we're talking about a
- potentially *LARGE* market. The fact that people already have
- emulators that require ROMs shows that people are willing to
- disassemble the ROMs in order to know enough about them to build
- emulators that require the ROMs. Since Mac ROMs are expensive, these
- emulators aren't particularly widespread.
-
- It is not clear that it is possible to give away software that in
- effect has our entire reverse engineered ROMs in it and legally
- prevent people from writing emulators that read our demo into memory
- and then jump in and out of it as necessary. Again, this may sound
- like paranoia, but due to certain unique aspects of the Mac cloning
- game, it is in fact a serious consideration.
-
- That's why the demo version that's out there can only run a few
- programs; significant portions of ROMlib (our equivalent to the Mac
- ROMs) have been *removed* (not just hidden) in the demo version.
-
- However, all is not lost. The problem that people are concerned
- about should be ameliorated by a few things:
-
- NeXT is about to get a site license that will allow all NeXT
- *owned* machines to run Executor 1.3. This will give them
- greater familiarity with our product and hopefully some of
- them will relay messages about what works and what doesn't.
-
- We've hired three non-programmers to handle tech. support.
- In the past we've had programmers doing tech. support and
- the unfortunate reality is that they'd get pulled into
- into programming at the expense of keeping logs of what
- works and what doesn't work.
-
- Executor 1.3 will be able to run more programs. As more
- things run, the more copies we sell and the more feedback
- we get and the more likely it is that one of you will know
- the answer to the question of does xxx run. It also means
- that it's more likely that someone you know, or who is in
- your users' group will have a copy of Executor.
-
- We're selling through dealers now; some of them are testing
- programs and letting us know the results.
-
- ISV's are increasingly willing to send us software for us to
- test so we can advertise that it runs, or make it run in the
- next version if it doesn't.
-
- Happy Holidays.
-
- --Cliff
-
-