home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- id m0uRLEp-0007tga; Wed, 5 Jun 96 10:15 MDT
- Sender: owner-executor
- Received: from ardi.com by ftp.ardi.com
- (Smail3.1.29.1 #3) id m0uRLD7-0007tfn; Wed, 5 Jun 96 10:13 MDT
- Path: sloth.swcp.com!usenet
- From: Clifford T. Matthews <ctm@ardi.com>
- Newsgroups: comp.emulators.mac.executor
- Subject: Re: congrats to ardi
- Date: 05 Jun 1996 09:37:38 -0600
- Organization: ARDI
- Lines: 35
- Message-ID: <ufu3wqfeil.fsf@ftp.ardi.com>
- References: <4p1fel$hit@litecuno.ecse.rpi.edu>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: ftp.ardi.com
- In-reply-to: gilem@litecuno.ecse.rpi.edu's message of 4 Jun 1996 09:58:45 -0400
- X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.0
- To: executor@ardi.com
- X-MailNews-Gateway: From newsgroup comp.emulators.mac.executor
- Sender: owner-executor@ardi.com
- Precedence: bulk
-
- >>>>> "Mike" == Michael R Gile <gilem@litecuno.ecse.rpi.edu> writes:
- In article <4p1fel$hit@litecuno.ecse.rpi.edu> gilem@litecuno.ecse.rpi.edu (Michael R. Gile) writes:
-
-
- Mike> I am (slowly) catching up on my magazine reading, and
- Mike> happened to pick up my may issue of IEEE Computer. I was
- Mike> suprised to see that ARDI and Executor are mentioned quite
- Mike> heavily as an opportunity for apple to attack the intel
- Mike> market. I sincerely hope that apple reads this article and
- Mike> reconsiders a venture with ARDI. However, even if they
- Mike> don't, it makes for good press.
-
- Yes. We have a Mac ISV to thank for that. Some Mac only ISVs are
- disappointed that they have no way to sell their apps on PCs. On Guy
- Kawasaki's "Semper Fi" mailing list there has been a lot of discussion
- about allowing MacOS to run on PCs, but the vast majority of it is
- founded on ignorance. Apple has been chided in the past for having a
- not invented here syndrome and unfortunately it looks like they're
- continuing that tradition.
-
- Although we met informally with some members of the MAE group (the
- gentleman who invited us to drop by is no longer with Apple) a couple
- years ago, we have not had an official invitation to talk to Apple in
- all our (soon to be ten) years of existence. That is not due to a
- lack of trying on our part. I think that's a shame. We're sending
- some copies of Executor 2 beta1 into Apple, although mostly its to
- people who aren't in very high places.
-
- In a couple of weeks I'll be at MacHack '96 presenting a paper on
- Executor internals and showing off Executor in general. If we can't
- wrangle a meeting with Apple out of that presentation we'll just have
- to conclude that they don't want to have anything to do with us.
-
- --Cliff
- ctm@ardi.com
-
-