home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
Wrap
id m0uQlQA-0007tXa; Mon, 3 Jun 96 20:00 MDT Sender: owner-executor Received: by ftp.ardi.com (Smail3.1.29.1 #3) id m0uQlHA-0007tYC; Mon, 3 Jun 96 19:51 MDT Received: from mypc.indy.tds.net (roin2-a16.indy.tds.net [204.246.14.145]) by madison.tdsnet.com (8.6.12/CICNet) with SMTP id UAA01860; Mon, 3 Jun 1996 20:49:35 -0500 Mime-version: 1.0 Message-id: <199606040149.UAA01860@madison.tdsnet.com> Cc: executor@ardi.com Subject: Re: Executor and Windows 95 To: Morgan Bowen <gameman@INETWORLD.NET> X-mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.2 From: Gene Michael DeClark <gdeclar@indy.tds.net> Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-sender: gdeclar@mail.tds.net Date: Mon, 3 Jun 1996 20:49:35 -0500 Sender: owner-executor@ardi.com Precedence: bulk At 07:31 PM 6/2/96 -0700, you wrote: >This is both for Executor users and ARDI. >If you have Windows 95(Mac84) and can't wait for the Windows 95 version of Executor, these programs might >help.: (etc.) Okay, NOT to start a flame war here, I just have to point out that, despite all of Windows 95's obvious flaws and Microsoft's larger concern for capital than quality, the whole nickname of Mac84 I keep hearing is inaccurate and unfair. Anyone who has used a Mac from 84 and Windows 95 would know how and why this statement is true, so I will limit myself to one observation: Macintosh in 1984 was NOT a multitasking system. This whole analogy is really a flame in itself, and besides that is more apples and potatoes than apples and oranges. --Gene