home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- id m0uGCew-0007sYC; Sun, 5 May 96 16:52 MDT
- Received: from log3 ([128.100.100.195]) by bureau-de-poste.utcc.utoronto.ca with SMTP id <799962(4)>; Sun, 5 May 1996 18:50:35 -0400
- Mime-version: 1.0
- Message-id: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960505184451.12239A-100000@log3>
- Subject: Beta 1 not different from Beta 0 ...
- To: executor@ardi.com
- Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
- X-sender: rick.ho@log3
- From: rick.ho@utoronto.ca
- Date: Sun, 5 May 1996 18:50:31 -0400
- Sender: owner-executor@ardi.com
- Precedence: bulk
-
-
- Can anyone tell me if there is any difference between Executor 2 Beta 1
- and Beta 0. I'm sure some bugs are fixed in Beta 1, but is there any
- major improvements, quicktime/ATM compatibility, better printing, etc.
-
- I'm looking forward to the un-crippled version. E/D 2 runs much faster
- than E/D 1.99q even with the sound on.
-
- PS. you can actually use the E/D 2 new look by overwriting the
- EXSYSTEM.HFV in v1.99q with that of v2. Don't forget to backup the old
- exsystem.hfv just in case.
-
- :->
- Rick
-
-