home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- id m0uC6GE-0007sBa; Wed, 24 Apr 96 09:13 MDT
- Sender: owner-executor
- Received: from ardi.com by ftp.ardi.com
- (Smail3.1.29.1 #3) id m0uC6Fe-0007s4n; Wed, 24 Apr 96 09:13 MDT
- Path: sloth.swcp.com!tesuque.cs.sandia.gov!ferrari.mst6.lanl.gov!newshost.lanl.gov!ncar!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!hookup!news.mathworks.com!uunet!in2.uu.net!mail2news.alias.net!myriad!mylinuxbox!suck!netcom.com!ixnews1.ix.netcom.com!ix.netcom.com!news
- From: "S. Duhaime" <smd3@ix.netcom.com>
- Newsgroups: comp.emulators.mac.executor
- Subject: DOS vs. LINUX
- Date: Tue, 23 Apr 1996 18:20:46 -0400
- Organization: Student @ John Stark High School
- Lines: 8
- Message-ID: <317D57BE.41FF@ix.netcom.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: man-nh2-11.ix.netcom.com
- Mime-Version: 1.0
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- X-NETCOM-Date: Tue Apr 23 5:19:39 PM CDT 1996
- X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.01Gold (Win95; I)
- To: executor@ardi.com
- X-MailNews-Gateway: From newsgroup comp.emulators.mac.executor
- Sender: owner-executor@ardi.com
- Precedence: bulk
-
- Are there any functionality improvements over having E/L than E/D. I'm
- getting another drive soon, and I intend to install linux on that, and
- keep Win95. I will be able to run both DOS, and LINUX versions of
- executor. But I want to know if one runs Mac apps better/faster...
-
-
- steve...
- (smd3@ix.netcom.com)
-
-