home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ Executor 2.0 / executorv2.0.iso / pc / dos / extra / docs / maillist / text / archive.96 / text5266.txt < prev    next >
Encoding:
Text File  |  1996-07-25  |  1.4 KB  |  43 lines
  1.     id m0u9nve-0007rfa; Thu, 18 Apr 96 01:14 MDT
  2. Sender: owner-executor
  3. Received: from ardi.com by ftp.ardi.com
  4.     (Smail3.1.29.1 #3) id m0u9ntx-0007s0n; Thu, 18 Apr 96 01:13 MDT
  5. Newsgroups: comp.emulators.mac.executor
  6. Path: sloth.swcp.com!tesuque.cs.sandia.gov!ferrari.mst6.lanl.gov!newshost.lanl.gov!ncar!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!news.mathworks.com!uunet!in2.uu.net!utcsri!cdf.toronto.edu!news
  7. From: Rick Ho <a484howa@cdf.toronto.edu>
  8. Subject: Executor 2beta0 runs faster?
  9. X-Sender: a484howa@eddie
  10. Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
  11. Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.90.960417142238.17473F-100000@eddie>
  12. Nntp-Posting-Host: eddie
  13. Organization: University of Toronto Computing Disciplines Facility
  14. Mime-Version: 1.0
  15. Date: Wed, 17 Apr 1996 18:29:50 GMT
  16. Lines: 20
  17. To: executor@ardi.com
  18. X-MailNews-Gateway: From newsgroup comp.emulators.mac.executor
  19. Sender: owner-executor@ardi.com
  20. Precedence: bulk
  21.  
  22. According to the benchmark program included with Executor 1.99q/2.0b0, 
  23. Executor v2 beta 0 runs just under four times as fast as Executor 1.99q.  
  24. However, most of you report slower performance with v2 beta 0. Can 
  25. someone explain why.
  26.  
  27. My system configuration:
  28.  
  29. AMD 486DX2-80 w/ 128K cache
  30. 20M RAM
  31. ATI Mach32 VESA Local-bus video
  32.  
  33. Windows 95
  34. Univbe 5.1
  35.  
  36. And I'm running Executor (both 1.99q/2beta0) under Windows 95 DOS prompt.
  37.  
  38. :->
  39. Rick
  40.  
  41. PS. don't hit reply, instead send your reply to rick.ho@utoronto.ca
  42.  
  43.