home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- id m0u9Zrl-0007rsa; Wed, 17 Apr 96 10:14 MDT
- Sender: owner-executor
- Received: from ardi.com by ftp.ardi.com
- (Smail3.1.29.1 #3) id m0u9ZrA-0007rpn; Wed, 17 Apr 96 10:13 MDT
- Path: sloth.swcp.com!tesuque.cs.sandia.gov!ferrari.mst6.lanl.gov!newshost.lanl.gov!ncar!csn!news-1.csn.net!imci3!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in1.uu.net!world!mv!news.missouri.edu!hptemp1.cc.umr.edu!khigh01
- From: khigh01@saucer.cc.umr.edu (Kerry Lee High Jr)
- Newsgroups: comp.emulators.mac.executor
- Subject: Re: Let's get System 7.x on top!
- Date: 15 Apr 1996 13:40:53 GMT
- Organization: UMR Missouri's Technological University
- Lines: 13
- Message-ID: <4ktjl5$c4v@hptemp1.cc.umr.edu>
- References: <ufratq8o77.fsf@ftp.ardi.com> <b14.9/21/95M27.4405497@Default.ibm.net>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: saucer.cc.umr.edu
- X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
- To: executor@ardi.com
- X-MailNews-Gateway: From newsgroup comp.emulators.mac.executor
- Sender: owner-executor@ardi.com
- Precedence: bulk
-
- purdymj@Default.ibm.net wrote:
-
- : > Dwight> I favour implementation of MacOS overlay before a port to
- : > Dwight> Win95(aka Mac85).
- : >
- : >We will embark on both simultaneously. There are drawbacks to waiting
- : >for the completion of either before starting the other. However, a
- : >port to Windows '95 is *much* easier (and less complicated legally)
- : >and will probably finish much sooner than the drop-in feature.
-
-
- : Would a native Win95 version inherently run faster than the DOS version (being that it would be 32bit)
- Isn't the DOS version 32 bit?
-
-