home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- id m0u7Rom-0007rXa; Thu, 11 Apr 96 13:14 MDT
- Sender: owner-executor
- Received: from ardi.com by ftp.ardi.com
- (Smail3.1.29.1 #3) id m0u7Rns-0007rcn; Thu, 11 Apr 96 13:13 MDT
- Path: sloth.swcp.com!tesuque.cs.sandia.gov!ferrari.mst6.lanl.gov!newshost.lanl.gov!ncar!csn!news-1.csn.net!imci3!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!info.ucla.edu!news.ucdavis.edu!slouken
- From: slouken@cs.ucdavis.edu (Sam Oscar Lantinga)
- Newsgroups: comp.emulators.mac.executor
- Subject: Re: Let's get System 7.x on top!
- Date: 10 Apr 1996 19:31:34 GMT
- Organization: University of California, Davis
- Lines: 18
- Message-ID: <4kh2am$cpl@mark.ucdavis.edu>
- References: <4kgbhg$km6@newsbf02.news.aol.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: maybach.cs.ucdavis.edu
- X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
- To: executor@ardi.com
- X-MailNews-Gateway: From newsgroup comp.emulators.mac.executor
- Sender: owner-executor@ardi.com
- Precedence: bulk
-
- PurdyM (purdym@aol.com) wrote:
- : I'm disappointed in the idea that E3 will still not allow the true MacOS
- : to be placed on top of it. If ARDI is planning a Win95 specific version,
- : that could be AFTER the MacOS can be placed on top...it just seems that
- : the DOS version is fine for Win95 and more folks might like to use System
- : 7.5 before the Win95 version...
-
- Even though I use both Linux and Windows 95, I kindof agree.
-
- Windows 95 has decent DOS-box emulation (observation, no flames please)
- and System 7 is a hot item on probably everyone's list. :)
-
- BTW, sounds like you are juggling problems with the beta releases. :)
-
- Good luck!
-
- See ya,
- -Sam
-
-