home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- id m0u6R4X-0007rfa; Mon, 8 Apr 96 18:14 MDT
- Sender: owner-executor
- Received: from ardi.com by ftp.ardi.com
- (Smail3.1.29.1 #3) id m0u6R3X-0007ran; Mon, 8 Apr 96 18:13 MDT
- Path: sloth.swcp.com!tesuque.cs.sandia.gov!ferrari.mst6.lanl.gov!newshost.lanl.gov!ncar!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!lll-winken.llnl.gov!venus.sun.com!cs.utexas.edu!geraldo.cc.utexas.edu!usenet
- From: ccheney@mail.utexas.edu (Chris Cheney)
- Newsgroups: comp.emulators.mac.executor
- Subject: Re: System 7
- Date: Mon, 08 Apr 1996 18:11:31 GMT
- Organization: The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
- Lines: 16
- Message-ID: <4kbl32$dnj@geraldo.cc.utexas.edu>
- References: <v02120d03ad87a9413a83@[199.246.2.149]> <4juhp3$56o@news1.warwick.net>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: slip-46-1.ots.utexas.edu
- X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
- To: executor@ardi.com
- X-MailNews-Gateway: From newsgroup comp.emulators.mac.executor
- Sender: owner-executor@ardi.com
- Precedence: bulk
-
- 71231.104@compuserve.com (Richard Slobod) wrote:
- -snip-
- >I don't recall Microsoft coming out with a system that rendered old
- >software useless. Win95 can run the vast majority of Win3.x and even
- >DOS programs. I don't think an OS that can run programs from the
- >early eighties can really be thought of as abandoning the past.
-
- Hmm, how do I get those old Win 1.x and 2.x programs to run? They
- don't seem to even like to run on old Win 3.0 much less Win95.
-
- >On the other hand, I do remember a post in this group from a Mac user
- >who wanted to know if Executor would run under SoftWindows because it
- >was the only way he could think of to get a System 6-specific app
- >running on his PowerMac.
-
-
-
-