home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Organization: Arizona State University
- Lines: 17
- Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960327182921.632B-100000@general1.asu.edu>
- References: <4jblvm$9mc@newsbf02.news.aol.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: general1.asu.edu
- Mime-Version: 1.0
- Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
- X-Sender: kucenskm@general1.asu.edu
- In-Reply-To: <4jblvm$9mc@newsbf02.news.aol.com>
- To: executor@ardi.com
- X-MailNews-Gateway: From newsgroup comp.emulators.mac.executor
- Sender: owner-executor@ardi.com
- Precedence: bulk
-
- On 27 Mar 1996, PurdyM wrote:
-
- > Forget system 7....how about 7.5 and <future> Copeland?
- >
- > Think about it, we really need executor to be powermac compatible. It is
- > rather a bummer to think about buying an emulator that seems a little
- > behind in regards to the software it can run. That would be like Insignia
- > (makers of a PC emulator for Mac) releasing a 12MHz 286 emulator.
- >
- > Ardi would scoop a huge market if they made Executor compatible with
- > PowerMac applications. Let's Hope.
- >
- >
- Emulating a PowerMac would take some serious effort. It seems like it
- would be almost impossible with the current Intel Technology.
-
- -Matt
-
-