home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- id m0u1ZVD-0007r3a; Tue, 26 Mar 96 07:13 MST
- Sender: owner-executor
- Received: from ardi.com by ftp.ardi.com
- (Smail3.1.29.1 #3) id m0u1ZUg-0007qwn; Tue, 26 Mar 96 07:13 MST
- Path: sloth.swcp.com!tesuque.cs.sandia.gov!ferrari.mst6.lanl.gov!nntp-server.caltech.edu!nntp1.jpl.nasa.gov!news.iag.net!news.math.psu.edu!psuvax1!news.cc.swarthmore.edu!netnews.upenn.edu!taurus.fccc.edu!sauder
- From: sauder@castor.fccc.edu (John Michael Sauder)
- Newsgroups: comp.emulators.mac.executor
- Subject: Re: Can someone verify E/D 1.99q11 speedups?
- Date: 25 Mar 1996 15:23:54 GMT
- Organization: Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
- Lines: 16
- Message-ID: <4j6dqa$38s@taurus.fccc.edu>
- References: <m0u09oL-000GOKC@gwar.ardi.com> <m0u0uSy-000GOKC@gwar.ardi.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: castor.rm.fccc.edu
- To: executor@ardi.com
- X-MailNews-Gateway: From newsgroup comp.emulators.mac.executor
- Sender: owner-executor@ardi.com
- Precedence: bulk
-
- In article <m0u0uSy-000GOKC@gwar.ardi.com> mat@ardi.com (Mat Hostetter) writes:
- >Thanks to all who responded and verified that 1.99q11 really is
- >noticeably faster on many systems. I'm convinced, so there's no need
- >to run any more "stopwatch" tests for me. Thanks again!
- >
- >-Mat
-
- I had tried installing Executor on a 25 MHz 386 with a slow hard
- drive. It was so amazingly slow that it was completely useless. It would
- take literally hours to do simple tasks. With q10, there is such an amazing
- speed-up that I would no longer classify it as "useless". There seems to
- be at LEAST a 5-fold increase in speed, probably more.
- --
-
- -- Mike S. (M_Sauder@fccc.edu)
- www.fccc.edu/research/labs/roder/mike.html
-
-