home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- id m0u0rUG-0007qxa; Sun, 24 Mar 96 08:13 MST
- Sender: owner-executor
- Received: from ardi.com by ftp.ardi.com
- (Smail3.1.29.1 #3) id m0u0rTh-0007r1n; Sun, 24 Mar 96 08:13 MST
- Path: sloth.swcp.com!news.dgsys.com!en.com!in-news.erinet.com!imci5!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!xavier.cybersmith.com!news.mathworks.com!zombie.ncsc.mil!admaix.sunydutchess.edu!ub!newsstand.cit.cornell.edu!wmagro
- From: wmagro@msc.cornell.edu (William Magro)
- Newsgroups: comp.emulators.mac.executor
- Subject: Re: Another Mac Rom Question
- Date: 22 Mar 1996 04:47:59 GMT
- Organization: Cornell University
- Lines: 11
- Message-ID: <4itbdv$o3k@newsstand.cit.cornell.edu>
- References: <31521DBE.1D51@cais.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: theory.tc.cornell.edu
- X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
- To: executor@ardi.com
- X-MailNews-Gateway: From newsgroup comp.emulators.mac.executor
- Sender: owner-executor@ardi.com
- Precedence: bulk
-
- Fabian Jimenez (fabian@cais.com) wrote:
- : Why not just let the
- : end user supply their own rom images (legally) like those Mac emulators
- : that exist for the Amiga and Atari?
-
- An important source of executor's speed is its native implementation
- of OS functions. To use the roms would mean emulating 68040 code
- all of the time. This would be slow. Of course there are other
- good reasons for not using the ROMs, as well.
-
- --Bill
-
-