home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- id m0u0cvE-0007qda; Sat, 23 Mar 96 16:40 MST
- Sender: owner-executor
- Received: by ftp.ardi.com (Smail3.1.29.1 #3)
- id m0u0clf-0007qtC; Sat, 23 Mar 96 16:30 MST
- Received: by gwar.ardi.com (Smail3.1.29.1 #3)
- References: <199603232112.QAA21883@magicnet.magicnet.net>
- Message-id: <m0u0cNY-000GOKC@gwar.ardi.com>
- Subject: Re: Executor in general
- Cc: executor@ardi.com
- In-reply-to: <199603232112.QAA21883@magicnet.magicnet.net>
- To: Jon Abbott <jabbott@magicnet.net>
- Date: Sat, 23 Mar 96 16:05 MST
- From: mat@ardi.com (Mat Hostetter)
- Sender: owner-executor@ardi.com
- Precedence: bulk
-
- >>>>> "Jon" == Jon Abbott <jabbott@magicnet.net> writes:
-
- Jon> When running the Fractal drawing program under Executor 1.1,
- Jon> it took about 10 seconds to draw the fractal (redrawing it
- Jon> after bringing up the about screen), and it took 14 seconds
- Jon> under Executor 1.99q11. Doesn't sound too good, especially
- Jon> considering how the documentation said that 2.0 would be
- Jon> twice as fast..
-
- Did you try 1.99q11 in 1 bit color mode? Color can slow things down.
- Also, floating point isn't going to be any faster (although I wouldn't
- think it would be slower, either), so if this is floating-point
- intensive your results won't be indicative of general integer
- performance.
-
- If you run Speedometer you'll see that Executor 1.99q11 is *much*
- faster than 1.1.
-
- -Mat
-
-