home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- id m0u0bZ6-0007qxa; Sat, 23 Mar 96 15:13 MST
- Sender: owner-executor
- Received: from ardi.com by ftp.ardi.com
- (Smail3.1.29.1 #3) id m0u0bYY-0007qdn; Sat, 23 Mar 96 15:13 MST
- Path: sloth.swcp.com!tesuque.cs.sandia.gov!ferrari.mst6.lanl.gov!nntp-server.caltech.edu!nntp1.jpl.nasa.gov!news.magicnet.net!news.supernet.net!news.cais.net!news2.cais.com!news
- From: Fabian Jimenez <fabian@cais.com>
- Newsgroups: comp.emulators.mac.executor
- Subject: Another Mac Rom Question
- Date: Thu, 21 Mar 1996 22:25:50 -0500
- Organization: Capital Area Internet Service, Inc.
- Lines: 5
- Message-ID: <31521DBE.1D51@cais.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: fabian.cais.com
- Mime-Version: 1.0
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (Win95; I)
- To: executor@ardi.com
- X-MailNews-Gateway: From newsgroup comp.emulators.mac.executor
- Sender: owner-executor@ardi.com
- Precedence: bulk
-
- I know Cliff has said that there were legal reasons as to why they don't
- use Mac Roms for their emulator. I would suppose that this would only
- apply if they provided those rom images for it. Why not just let the
- end user supply their own rom images (legally) like those Mac emulators
- that exist for the Amiga and Atari?
-
-