home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- id m0tyyqA-0007qWa; Tue, 19 Mar 96 03:40 MST
- Sender: owner-executor
- Received: by ftp.ardi.com (Smail3.1.29.1 #3)
- id m0tyyhf-0007qZC; Tue, 19 Mar 96 03:31 MST
- Received: (from d_burr@localhost) by starfleet.gov (8.6.11/8.6.9) id CAA01147; Tue, 19 Mar 1996 02:30:35 -0800
- Mime-version: 1.0
- Message-id: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960319022915.917A-100000@starfleet.gov>
- Subject: Re: QuickDraw or No???
- Cc: executor@ardi.com
- Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
- In-reply-to: <314cf885.1034712@nntp.ix.netcom.com>
- To: Frogboyz <froggy5@ix.netcom.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Mar 1996 02:30:34 -0800 (PST)
- From: Donald Burr <d_burr@ix.netcom.com>
- X-sender: d_burr@starfleet.gov
- Sender: owner-executor@ardi.com
- Precedence: bulk
-
- On Mon, 18 Mar 1996, Frogboyz wrote:
-
- > Certain Macintosh programs allow direct writes to video hardware,
- > bypassing Quickdraw, and it is supposed to improve speed. I don't
- > know whether or not this is recommended under Executor. Any ideas?
-
- These applications work under Executor. I believe there is a switch or
- text field in the preferences (Cmd-Shift-5) panel that has to do with
- detecting and handling apps that bypass QuickDraw. I should warn you
- though that performance for these apps is poor, especially in X windows
- based systems. Under E/DOS you can get pretty good performance if you
- have a video card that can do VESA 2.0 and linear framebuffer, or if you
- run UniVBE (helpful for older video boards -- it REALLY sped up my older
- Orchid board).
-
- Donald Burr [d_burr@ix.netcom.com], PO Box 91212, Santa Barbara CA 93190-1212
- TEL (805)564-1871 / FAX 564-2315 / WWW http://www.geopages.com/WallStreet/2072
- PGP Public Key available by request (send e-mail) or on Public Key Servers.
- ** Uphold your right to privacy - Use PGP. **
-
-