home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ Executor 2.0 / executorv2.0.iso / pc / dos / extra / docs / maillist / text / archive.96 / text2884.txt < prev    next >
Encoding:
Text File  |  1996-07-25  |  1.1 KB  |  33 lines
  1. Newsgroups: comp.emulators.mac.executor
  2. Subject: Re: QuickDraw or No???
  3. Date: Mon, 18 Mar 1996 09:44:19 -0500
  4. Organization: NetPress Co.
  5. Lines: 14
  6. Message-ID: <314D76C3.759E581B@interport.net>
  7. References: <314cf885.1034712@nntp.ix.netcom.com>
  8. NNTP-Posting-Host: bryan.port.net
  9. Mime-Version: 1.0
  10. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
  11. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
  12. X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (X11; I; Linux 1.2.13 i586)
  13. To: executor@ardi.com
  14. X-MailNews-Gateway: From newsgroup comp.emulators.mac.executor
  15. Sender: owner-executor@ardi.com
  16. Precedence: bulk
  17.  
  18. Frogboyz wrote:
  19. > 
  20. > Certain Macintosh programs allow direct writes to video hardware,
  21. > bypassing Quickdraw, and it is supposed to improve speed.  I don't
  22. > know whether or not this is recommended under Executor.  Any ideas?
  23.  
  24. As I understand Director 4.0, for example, does its own screen writes.
  25. It works under Executor, but leaves partially un-redrawn screens.
  26. Otherwise it seem to work fine.
  27.  
  28. -- 
  29. Bryan Taylor, Director     |    NetPress Co. bryan@netpressco.com    
  30. www.netpressco.com    |     See this page for details on
  31.     The Internet History & Technology Center
  32.  
  33.