home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- id m0twsFE-0007qFa; Wed, 13 Mar 96 08:13 MST
- Sender: owner-executor
- Received: from ardi.com by ftp.ardi.com
- (Smail3.1.29.1 #3) id m0twsEh-0007qBn; Wed, 13 Mar 96 08:13 MST
- Path: sloth.swcp.com!tesuque.cs.sandia.gov!ferrari.mst6.lanl.gov!newshost.lanl.gov!ncar!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!newsfeed.internetmci.com!panix!cmcl2!news!nyu
- From: lev1673@is2.nyu.edu (Larry Velez)
- Newsgroups: comp.emulators.mac.executor
- Subject: Proper memory switches for E/D 199q8 w/ 8M of physical RAM?
- Date: 12 Mar 1996 04:34:43 GMT
- Organization: New York University
- Lines: 34
- Message-ID: <4i2urq$1gk_001@edu.nyu.edu>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: dial3-2-async-12.dial.net.nyu.edu
- X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #4
- To: filtered_executor@ardi.com
- X-MailNews-Gateway: From newsgroup comp.emulators.mac.executor
- Sender: owner-executor@ardi.com
- Precedence: bulk
-
- I have tried:
-
- -memory 8M
- -applzone -6M -syszone 2M
- -applzone 4.5 -syszone 2M
- -applzone 4M
- -applzone 4.5M
- -applzone 8M
- -applzone 5M
-
- These were all used with and with out -oldtimer and -nosound.
- They all seemed to slow Executor down.
- I know some of these don't make sense, I was just trying to narrow it down to
- the best setting with no luck.
-
- So far, I get the best results using -oldtimer -nosound -nosplash
-
- I have not been able to get Executor to perform very well in Win95
-
- Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
-
- Also I am thinking of upgrading my 486/50/8M soon and am trying to decide
- between a fast (100,120,133)Mhz Pentium motherboard with my current 8 Megs of
- Ram or a not so fast (75,90)Mhz Pentium mb and uping the Ram to maybe 12 or 16
- Megs. Does Executor benefit more from increased Ram or processor speed? Is
- E/D's code optimized for the pentium chip?
-
- TIA for your help
-
-
-
- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
- Larry Velez
- lev1673@is2.nyu.edu
-
-