home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- (Smail3.1.29.1 #3) id m0twTt2-0007qUn; Tue, 12 Mar 96 06:13 MST
- Path: sloth.swcp.com!tesuque.cs.sandia.gov!ferrari.mst6.lanl.gov!newshost.lanl.gov!ncar!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!news.mathworks.com!fu-berlin.de!news.dfn.de!uni-muenster.de!muenster.westfalen.de!ms3.maus.westfalen.de!Georg_Bauer
- From: Georg_Bauer@ms3.maus.westfalen.de (Georg Bauer)
- Newsgroups: comp.emulators.mac.executor
- Distribution: world
- Message-ID: <199603101925.a6607@ms3.maus.de>
- References: <4hqrp8$h73@news.onramp.net>
- Organization: MAUS MS3 - Die dritte in Muenster
- Subject: Win 95/NT Executor
- X-Software: Erwinsgate gb0.9i (c) es@do2.maus.ruhr.de, gb@ms3.maus.westfalen.de
- Date: Sun, 10 Mar 96 19:25:00 +0200
- MIME-Version: 1.0
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
- Lines: 12
- To: executor@ardi.com
- X-MailNews-Gateway: From newsgroup comp.emulators.mac.executor
- Sender: owner-executor@ardi.com
- Precedence: bulk
-
- Hi!
-
- > Why arn't you just writing a hardware emulator for the 68040 Mac and let the
- > software functionality fall into place on their own. I understand that
-
- Would be much slower - the approach from ARDI garanties that the complete
- system-code is in native 486-code. That's _MUCH_ faster than emulated
- 68k-code. So I think ARDIs approach is far better than the approach of
- hardware-emulation - that would be slower and would force one to buy Apple
- ROMs.
-
- bye, Georg
-
-