home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Received: from unixs1.cis.pitt.edu (jrzst3@unixs1.cis.pitt.edu [136.142.185.20])
- by post-ofc01.srv.cis.pitt.edu with SMTP (8.7.4/cispo-2.0.1.1)
- ID <VAA04198@post-ofc01.srv.cis.pitt.edu> for <executor@ardi.com>;
- Sun, 10 Mar 1996 21:30:31 -0500 (EST)
- Date: Sun, 10 Mar 1996 21:30:30 -0500 (EST)
- From: Jeremy R Ziegler <jrzst3+@pitt.edu>
- Subject: linux or dos or win95?
- To: executor@ardi.com
- Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9603102105.A13367-0100000@unixs1.cis.pitt.edu>
- MIME-Version: 1.0
- Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
- Sender: owner-executor@ardi.com
- Precedence: bulk
-
- has anyone come to a definite conclusion which is the best way to run
- executor. i currently run windows 95 , but i have my computer booted by
- lilo, so i can choose to go linux if i want to. which is the best way?
- windows95 straight up? (which i have seen an ongoing argument about)
- windows 95 -- dos mode (with reboot)? or linux ? and if it is linux, is
- that through xwindows or straight from the command line?
-
- thanks
-
- |-----------------------------------------------------------------------|
- | Jeremy Ziegler | "Don't Panic." |
- | | |
- | E-Mail: jrzst3+@pitt.edu | --Douglas Adams |
- | | |
- | WWW: http://www.pitt.edu/~jrzst3 | |
- |-----------------------------------------------------------------------|
-
-
-