home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- (Smail3.1.29.1 #3) id m0tv1yt-0007qAn; Fri, 8 Mar 96 06:13 MST
- Path: sloth.swcp.com!news.ironhorse.com!news.unisys.com.br!news.uoregon.edu!hpg30a.csc.cuhk.hk!news.cuhk.edu.hk!newsfeeder.ust.hk!nntp.hk.super.net!news.duke.edu!news.mathworks.com!fu-berlin.de!news.dfn.de!uni-muenster.de!muenster.westfalen.de!ms3.maus.westfalen.de!Georg_Bauer
- From: Georg_Bauer@ms3.maus.westfalen.de (Georg Bauer)
- Newsgroups: comp.emulators.mac.executor
- Distribution: world
- Message-ID: <199603060842.a60491@ms3.maus.de>
- References: <m0ttbTz-000GOKC@gwar.ardi.com>
- Organization: MAUS MS3 - Die dritte in Muenster
- Subject: executor & windows95
- X-Software: Erwinsgate gb0.9i (c) es@do2.maus.ruhr.de, gb@ms3.maus.westfalen.de
- Date: Wed, 6 Mar 96 08:42:00 +0200
- MIME-Version: 1.0
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
- Lines: 14
- To: executor@ardi.com
- X-MailNews-Gateway: From newsgroup comp.emulators.mac.executor
- Sender: owner-executor@ardi.com
- Precedence: bulk
-
- Hi!
-
- > Video should be faster (if you've got UniVBE) because we can directly
- > access the linear frame buffer under DOS. Still, I wouldn't think
- > that the CPU number should slow down.
-
- Actually the Win95 does give you the same sort of penalty that EMM386 gives
- you, but worse. Every memory access runs through their paging code, so
- that is slowed down. Ok, most code is in the internal cache, but it's slow
- nonetheless. I found that I could even gain some more speed in the CPU
- benchmarks by just removing EMM386 and let the extender of Executor handle
- all the memory.
-
- bye, Georg
-
-