home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- id m0tubla-0007r4a; Thu, 7 Mar 96 02:13 MST
- Sender: owner-executor
- Received: from ardi.com by ftp.ardi.com
- (Smail3.1.29.1 #3) id m0tubl0-0007r1n; Thu, 7 Mar 96 02:13 MST
- Path: sloth.swcp.com!tesuque.cs.sandia.gov!ferrari.mst6.lanl.gov!newshost.lanl.gov!ncar!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!news.mathworks.com!zombie.ncsc.mil!nntp.coast.net!torn!news.bc.net!news.sfu.ca!splee
- From: splee@news.sfu.ca (Stephen P Lee)
- Newsgroups: comp.emulators.mac.executor
- Subject: Fonts in Word5.1 and Ghostscript
- Date: 5 Mar 1996 01:47:10 GMT
- Organization: Simon Fraser University
- Lines: 14
- Message-ID: <4hg6eu$ldi@morgoth.sfu.ca>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: beaufort.sfu.ca
- To: executor@ardi.com
- X-MailNews-Gateway: From newsgroup comp.emulators.mac.executor
- Sender: owner-executor@ardi.com
- Precedence: bulk
-
- It seems that when I print from Word5.1 in version 1.99q7 for Linux I get
- mediocre looking versions of Helvetica or which ever font I happen to be
- using at the time. I realize that the printed fonts come from ghostscript
- and I would have to get "real" postscript fonts and not the bitmapped
- versions to get better quality. The question is this: if I add new fonts
- to Word, will I have to add the equivalent fonts to ghostscript?
-
- Thanks,
- Stephen
- --
- Stephen P. Lee Office: (604) 291-4291
- Department of Biological Sciences Fax: (604) 291-3496
- Simon Fraser University E-mail: Stephen_p_lee@sfu.ca
- Burnaby, BC, Canada. V5A 1S6
-
-