home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- id m0tu7nx-0007qxa; Tue, 5 Mar 96 18:14 MST
- Sender: owner-executor
- Received: from ardi.com by ftp.ardi.com
- (Smail3.1.29.1 #3) id m0tu7nE-0007qwn; Tue, 5 Mar 96 18:13 MST
- Path: sloth.swcp.com!tesuque.cs.sandia.gov!ferrari.mst6.lanl.gov!newshost.lanl.gov!ncar!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in2.uu.net!istar.net!news1.vancouver.istar.net!news.vancouver.istar.net!van-bc!unixg.ubc.ca!news.bc.net!news.sfu.ca!quinlan
- From: quinlan@news.sfu.ca (Brian Quinlan)
- Newsgroups: comp.emulators.mac.executor,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
- Subject: Re: Executor (was Re: MACINTOSH IS BEST)
- Date: 3 Mar 1996 22:24:25 GMT
- Organization: Simon Fraser University
- Lines: 26
- Message-ID: <4hd66p$8mu@morgoth.sfu.ca>
- References: <4bdter$5os@netaxs.com> <4eal6n$e3t@zippy.cais.net> <DLuKzH.76M@news.cis.umn.edu> <4eqqve$1f7@complete.org> <4f9mh8$t84@giant.seas.smu.edu> <31195A5D.2781E494@valley.net> <31199EAC.3E6C@basic.net> <4fdl14$rul@news.iii.net> <4fdrl3$6f6@ixnews3.ix.netcom.com> <4fe6i2$ca7@madrid.visi.net> <jragosta-0902961517110001@ppp-1002.dca.net> <4gjfid$do@complete.org> <jragosta-2302961340020001@ppp-1002.dca.net> <ufka1cbkhd.fsf@ftp.ardi.com> <jragosta-2602961354040001@ppp-1012.dca.net> <ufg2bvskdp.f
- NNTP-Posting-Host: fraser.sfu.ca
- Xref: sloth.swcp.com comp.emulators.mac.executor:1369 comp.sys.mac.advocacy:92284
- To: executor@ardi.com
- X-MailNews-Gateway: From newsgroup comp.emulators.mac.executor
- Sender: owner-executor@ardi.com
- Precedence: bulk
-
- Clifford T. Matthews <ctm@ardi.com> writes:
-
- >Although the specific claim that "MHz per MHz Executor runs 68k code
- >faster than a PPC601" is no longer true (it was true when SynPaper was
- >written, when Apple was still shipping their first 68k emulator), the
- >point I was making in the exchange between Joe and me is still
- >correct. SoftWindows can run a greater percentage of applications
- >than Executor can, but Executor is significantly faster than
- >SoftWindows.
-
- This may be true but it's not a useful comparison. People who use
- PowerMacs probably don't use 68K programs to do any work where
- speed is important so the rate at which the PPC macs run 68K programs
- isn't important. A better comparison chart would be.
-
- PowerMac Pentium
- Speed of native
- applications.
-
- Speed of other
- platform emulated
- applications
-
- --
- Brian Quinlan "Never ask what sort of computer a guy drives. If he's a Mac
- quinlan@sfu.ca user, he'll tell you. If not, why embarrass him?" - Tom Clancy
-
-