Executor 2.0/executorv2.0.iso/pc/dos/extra/docs/maillist/text/archive.96/text0069.txt

Text File | 1996-07-25 | 11.6 KB | 284 lines

I was reading about the upcoming update for the MacOS known as Copland.
Apple will apparently, to cope with the growing clone market and
incompatibility issues, introduce a hardware abstaction layer (HAL),
making the new operating system ROM independent and disk based.

Won't this make development of Executor a lot easier, if Apple can
deliver on HAL?

Could all the effort going into replicating the functionality of the ROMs
be going to waste, as all that would be needed is to buy Copland and
install it over the emulated hardware.

Bye...

John de Bruin
Email: [e-mail]

From owner-paper Mon Jan  8 02:13:56 1996
Return-Path: <owner-paper>
Received: by ftp.ardi.com (Smail3.1.29.1 #3)
    id m0tZDeK-0007qDa; Mon, 8 Jan 96 02:13 MST
Sender: owner-paper
Received: from ardi.com by ftp.ardi.com
    (Smail3.1.29.1 #3) id m0tZDdm-0007qCn; Mon, 8 Jan 96 02:13 MST
Path: sloth.swcp.com!ns2.mainstreet.net!bug.rahul.net!a2i!infoseek.com!uunet!in2.uu.net!sysadmin.sequel.net!dialup7b.sequel.net!user
From: [e-mail] (Alex Timbol)
Newsgroups: comp.emulators.mac.executor
Subject: Re: ANYBODY HAVE A MAC EMULATOR FOR PC ?
Date: Sun, 07 Jan 1996 16:22:54 +0800
Organization: All AsiaSecurities
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <4cavum$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: dialup7b.sequel.net
To: [e-mail]
X-MailNews-Gateway: From newsgroup comp.emulators.mac.executor
Sender: [e-mail]
Precedence: bulk

In article <4cavum$[e-mail]>, [e-mail] wrote:


>
> What? Executor runs mac programs, reads & writes mac formatted media ect..
>

But not very effectively, and without many of the underlying technologies
(Quicktime, Publish and Subscribe,etc.). I don't know if you've heard of
Nutek--a Taiwanese company that made a dual processor clone that runs PC
and Mac OS.  By some  fancy legal footwork,they got around the copyright
issue with the Mac Roms, but they died just the same since their emulator
could only run about ten programs verrry slooowly.

Hasn't anyone figured out a way to get the Mac ROMs on an add-on PC board
and write an emulator around that?  The ROMs should be freely available
from junked Macs.

> >See More. Do More. The Power to Be Your Best. Get a Mac.
>
> Heh.. thats quite a slogan you've come up with.. think you went a little
> overboard w/ the capitalization though.

Not original.  See More. Do More is the E-machines (Video card/Monitor
Manufacturer, now part of Radius) slogan. The Power ... is the Mac slogan.

From owner-paper Mon Jan  8 10:15:14 1996
Return-Path: <owner-paper>
Received: by ftp.ardi.com (Smail3.1.29.1 #3)
    id m0tZL9a-0007qEa; Mon, 8 Jan 96 10:14 MST
Sender: owner-paper
Received: from ardi.com by ftp.ardi.com
    (Smail3.1.29.1 #3) id m0tZL8J-0007qDn; Mon, 8 Jan 96 10:13 MST
Path: sloth.swcp.com!news.dgsys.com!news.sprintlink.net!news.bluesky.net!solaris.cc.vt.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!newshost.convex.com!cnn.exu.ericsson.se!cnn.exu.ericsson.se!netnews
From: [e-mail] (Adam Roach)
Newsgroups: comp.emulators.mac.executor,comp.emulators.misc
Subject: Re: ANYBODY HAVE A MAC EMULATOR FOR PC ?
Followup-To: comp.emulators.misc
Date: 8 Jan 1996 09:09:49 -0600
Organization: little piles, all around my room
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <4crc3t$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: b04a24.exu.ericsson.se
Xref: sloth.swcp.com comp.emulators.mac.executor:721 comp.emulators.misc:5252
To: [e-mail]
X-MailNews-Gateway: From newsgroup comp.emulators.mac.executor
Sender: [e-mail]
Precedence: bulk

In article <[e-mail]>, Scott Hagie <[e-mail]> wrote:
>Again, don't get me wrong, C64S, (an emulator for the Commodore 64, which
>runs at a whole 1 Mhz and is ten years old) still doesn't run at full speed
>and it's compatible files percentage is still under 80%. What Ardi has done
>is impressive, but don't overstate it.


Actually, C64S runs at 288% original speed on a P60...


Direct followups to the comp.emulators.misc newsgroup.



--
Adam Roach -- [e-mail] -- Standard Disclaimers, etc.
  Insanity is the final defense ... It's hard to get a refund when the
  salesman is sniffing your crotch and baying at the moon.

From owner-paper Mon Jan  8 10:15:20 1996
Return-Path: <owner-paper>
Received: by ftp.ardi.com (Smail3.1.29.1 #3)
    id m0tZL9w-0007qDa; Mon, 8 Jan 96 10:15 MST
Sender: owner-paper
Received: from ardi.com by ftp.ardi.com
    (Smail3.1.29.1 #3) id m0tZL8H-0007qCn; Mon, 8 Jan 96 10:13 MST
Path: sloth.swcp.com!news.dgsys.com!news.sprintlink.net!malgudi.oar.net!caen!hookup!solaris.cc.vt.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in1.uu.net!skypoint.com!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (Richard Steiner)
Newsgroups: comp.emulators.mac.executor
Subject: Re: ANYBODY HAVE A MAC EMULATOR FOR PC ?
Date: 8 Jan 1996 01:43:09 -0600
Organization: SkyPoint Communications, Inc.
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
 <[e-mail]> <4cn605$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: mirage.skypoint.com
X-Newsreader: Yarn 0.84 with YES 0.20 and TDE 3.2a
X-Info: PC Yarn is a freeware SOUP-packet threaded offline newsreader,
        YES is the Yarn Editor Shell, a freeware utility for Yarn, and
        TDE is the Thomson-Davis Editor, a *wonderful* PD text editor!
To: [e-mail]
X-MailNews-Gateway: From newsgroup comp.emulators.mac.executor
Sender: [e-mail]
Precedence: bulk

Here in comp.emulators.mac.executor, [e-mail] (Ryan Hayle)
spake unto us, saying:

> No it isn't unfair..  No IBM company has needed to make an "Apple"
> compatibility card, because IBM users can already do everything
> they need to do.

Can't play Marathon on a PC.  Or on Executor (yet <g>).

> >See More. Do More. The Power to Be Your Best. Get a Mac.
>
> Ah, yes.  The power to crash daily, see a beautiful, black and
> white, and slower than light (hey, that rhymed!) operating system,
> and have all of your friends (internet or otherwise) look at you
> without respect.  I love Mac's!

You apparently don't know them very well.  :-)  Macs haven't been just
black and white for many years now, and my Mac at work is pretty slick
looking with its 19" SuperMAC screen.  No, System 7 ain't Warp, and
Finder could be improved, but it's a nice platform all the same...

--
  -Rich Steiner  >>>--->  [e-mail]  >>>---> Bloomington, MN
         Written offline using PC Yarn + Yes + TDE in a Warp VDM
            I have seen the evidence.  I want DIFFERENT evidence...

From owner-paper Mon Jan  8 11:25:32 1996
Return-Path: <owner-paper>
Received: by ftp.ardi.com (Smail3.1.29.1 #3)
    id m0tZMG8-0007qDa; Mon, 8 Jan 96 11:25 MST
Sender: owner-paper
Received: from gwar.ardi.com by ftp.ardi.com with bsmtp
    (Smail3.1.29.1 #3) id m0tZMFa-0007qCC; Mon, 8 Jan 96 11:24 MST
Received: from faust.ardi.com by gwar.ardi.com with smtp
    (Smail3.1.29.1 #3) id m0tZLzz-000GXNC; Mon, 8 Jan 96 11:08 MST
Message-Id: <[e-mail]>
Received: by faust.ardi.com (NX5.67e/NX3.0X)
    id AA01532; Mon, 8 Jan 96 11:08:46 -0700
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 96 11:08:46 -0700
From: [e-mail] (Melissa Algeo)
To: [e-mail]
Subject: Re: Soft Windows
Newsgroups: comp.emulators.mac.executor
In-Reply-To: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
Sender: [e-mail]
Precedence: bulk

>>>>> "John" == John de Bruin <[e-mail]> writes:

    John> I know this is a little silly and completly pointless but
    John> can SoftWindows for Mac, which emulates a 486 in its latest
    John> version I believe, run Executor/DS. I'm quite fascinated by
    John> the idea of having an emulator inside an emulator.

At least one user has successfully run Executor/DOS under SoftWindows.
I believe the current SoftWindows emulates a 386, which is what E/D
requires.

--
Melissa Algeo
[e-mail]

From owner-paper Mon Jan  8 13:13:50 1996
Return-Path: <owner-paper>
Received: by ftp.ardi.com (Smail3.1.29.1 #3)
    id m0tZNww-0007qDa; Mon, 8 Jan 96 13:13 MST
Sender: owner-paper
Received: from ardi.com by ftp.ardi.com
    (Smail3.1.29.1 #3) id m0tZNwP-0007qCn; Mon, 8 Jan 96 13:13 MST
Path: sloth.swcp.com!tesuque.cs.sandia.gov!ferrari.mst6.lanl.gov!newshost.lanl.gov!ncar!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!news.mathworks.com!news.kei.com!newsstand.cit.cornell.edu!news.tc.cornell.edu!news.cac.psu.edu!usenet
From: [e-mail] (emb121 (Eric Bennett))
Newsgroups: comp.emulators.mac.executor
Subject: Re: Soft Windows
Date: 8 Jan 1996 01:45:15 GMT
Organization: Penn State University, Center for Academic Computing
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <4cpsvb$[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: emb121.rh.psu.edu
X-Authinfo-User: [e-mail]
X-Posted-From: InterNews [e-mail]
X-Authenticated: emb121 on INN host hearst.cac.psu.edu
To: [e-mail]
X-MailNews-Gateway: From newsgroup comp.emulators.mac.executor
Sender: [e-mail]
Precedence: bulk

In article <[e-mail]>
John de Bruin <[e-mail]> writes:

> I know this is a little silly and completly pointless but can SoftWindows for Mac, which emulates
> a 486 in its latest version I believe, run Executor/DS. I'm quite fascinated by the idea of
> having an emulator inside an emulator.

No.  I tried 1.99p in SoftWindows 2.0 but Executor wouldn't start.  It
gave some sort of drive access error, which seems to indicate that
SoftWindows doesn't emulate the hard drive at a low enough level to
support Executor.

-Eric Bennett ([e-mail])

Drawing on my fine command of the language, I said nothing.
-Robert Benchley

From owner-paper Mon Jan  8 13:19:02 1996
Return-Path: <owner-paper>
Received: by ftp.ardi.com (Smail3.1.29.1 #3)
    id m0tZO20-0007qDa; Mon, 8 Jan 96 13:19 MST
Sender: owner-paper
Received: from source.inf.net by ftp.ardi.com with smtp
    (Smail3.1.29.1 #3) id m0tZO1R-0007qCC; Mon, 8 Jan 96 13:18 MST
Received: from ppp4.inf.net (ppp4.inf.net [206.27.218.74]) by source.inf.net (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id OAA32232 for <[e-mail]>; Mon, 8 Jan 1996 14:04:09 -0600
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 1996 14:04:09 -0600
Message-Id: <[e-mail]>
X-Sender: [e-mail]
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: [e-mail]
From: Calvin Smith <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: ShowStopper Bug List for 1.99q
Sender: [e-mail]
Precedence: bulk

At 09:52 AM 1/5/96 -0500, you wrote:
>In article <[e-mail]>, Calvin Smith
><[e-mail]> wrote:
>
>> (Second time at sending this message since first time didn't
>> have a subject)
>>
>> O.K. Here is my bug list for 1.99q that i'm still waiting to be fixed:
>>
>> McDraw II v1.1 Still doesn't print right.
>
>Are you sure the problems with MacDraw are related to Executor and
>not to MacDraw?  MacDraw II is pretty old (it has been upgraded first
>to MacDraw Pro then to ClarisDraw), so the problems that you are seeing
>with the pictures and the printing could be due to the old version.
>
>Dave.

Yes the problem is with MacDraw II since if I run the same program on a
REAL mac the printing is correct even with the same data files.