home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
Wrap
Received: from ftp.ardi.com (ftp.ardi.com [204.134.8.1]) by nacm.com (8.6.10/8.6.9) with SMTP id JAA07740 for <executor@nacm.com>; Tue, 5 Dec 1995 09:13:19 -0800 Received: from ardi.com by ftp.ardi.com (Smail3.1.29.1 #3) id m0tN0vV-0007qAn; Tue, 5 Dec 95 10:13 MST Newsgroups: comp.emulators.mac.executor Path: sloth.swcp.com!tesuque.cs.sandia.gov!ferrari.mst6.lanl.gov!newshost.lanl.gov!ncar!gatech!news.mathworks.com!news.kei.com!wang!uunet!in1.uu.net!cygnus.com!kithrup.com!mrs From: mrs@kithrup.com (Mike Stump) Subject: Re: Executor usefulness? Organization: Kithrup Enterprises, Ltd. Message-ID: <DJ2s9I.13r@kithrup.com> References: <49hrhc$vm@leepai.cs.purdue.edu> <49skep$r2q@hearst.cac.psu.edu> <49ssst$kab@tribune.usask.ca> <s5gka4dvpeg.fsf@catfish.lcs.mit.edu> Date: Mon, 4 Dec 1995 18:48:53 GMT Lines: 12 To: executor@nacm.com X-MailNews-Gateway: From newsgroup comp.emulators.mac.executor Sender: owner-paper@nacm.com Precedence: bulk In article <s5gka4dvpeg.fsf@catfish.lcs.mit.edu>, Patrick J. LoPresti <patl@lcs.mit.edu> wrote: > >I would add that performance under SVGAlib is *significantly* better >than under X (assuming linear frame buffer support exists for your >video card). X is particularly poorly suited for emulating >applications which avoid the Mac ROMs and try to scribble directly to >screen memory. Quite a few X servers permit use of an extension call shared memory, that permits an application to write directly to the screen's video RAM. Performace doesn't have to be bad.