home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ Executor 2.0 / executorv2.0.iso / pc / dos / extra / docs / maillist / text / archive.95 / text7633.txt < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1996-03-31  |  2.0 KB

  1. Received: from ftp.ardi.com (ftp.ardi.com [204.134.8.1]) by nacm.com (8.6.10/8.6.9) with SMTP id AAA05811 for <executor@nacm.com>; Tue, 5 Dec 1995 00:14:06 -0800
  2. Received: from ardi.com by ftp.ardi.com
  3.     (Smail3.1.29.1 #3) id m0tMsVY-0007q7n; Tue, 5 Dec 95 01:13 MST
  4. Path: sloth.swcp.com!tesuque.cs.sandia.gov!ferrari.mst6.lanl.gov!newshost.lanl.gov!ncar!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!news.mathworks.com!uhog.mit.edu!news.kei.com!nntp.coast.net!torn!howland.reston.ans.net!agate!news.Stanford.EDU!viveks
  5. From: viveks@leland.Stanford.EDU (Vivek Subramanian)
  6. Newsgroups: comp.emulators.mac.executor
  7. Subject: Re: Executor usefulness?
  8. Date: 3 Dec 1995 23:55:34 -0800
  9. Organization: Stanford University
  10. Lines: 22
  11. Message-ID: <49u9hm$h37@elaine19.Stanford.EDU>
  12. References: <49hrhc$vm@leepai.cs.purdue.edu> <ufraylfuz2.fsf@ftp.ardi.com>
  13. NNTP-Posting-Host: elaine19.stanford.edu
  14. X-newsreader: xrn 7.03
  15. To: executor@nacm.com
  16. X-MailNews-Gateway: From newsgroup comp.emulators.mac.executor
  17. Sender: owner-paper@nacm.com
  18. Precedence: bulk
  19.  
  20.  
  21. I downloaded the executor demo yesterday... I must say, I am
  22. impressed...it really runs fast.  I have seen a PowerPC running
  23. Windows, and it crawls compared to the reverse. Great Job!!!
  24.  
  25. As far as usefulness is concerned, I can see at least one use (which
  26. is why am on this newsgroup at all)... I work in a mixed environment
  27. of Macs and PCs, and I have to make sure that documents I prepare
  28. on my PC look exactly the same on the mac (unfortunately, it seems
  29. like conversion tools still do a pretty poor job, especially for 
  30. technical applications.)> Executor enables (potentially, anyway) me
  31. to do this on my PC easily.
  32.  
  33. I say potentially, because some of the software I use requires system7.
  34. Any news on patches to enable this software?  Have you tested any 
  35. mainstream software which "requires" system7 but still runs on executor?
  36. Is there a software compatibility list anywhere?
  37.  
  38. Thanks... once again, this is definitely a really impressive job!
  39.  
  40. Vivek Subramanian.
  41.  
  42.  
  43.