home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
Wrap
Received: from ftp.ardi.com (ftp.ardi.com [204.134.8.1]) by nacm.com (8.6.10/8.6.9) with SMTP id KAA00930 for <executor@nacm.com>; Mon, 4 Dec 1995 10:13:50 -0800 Received: from ardi.com by ftp.ardi.com (Smail3.1.29.1 #3) id m0tMfOQ-0007qFn; Mon, 4 Dec 95 11:13 MST Path: sloth.swcp.com!tesuque.cs.sandia.gov!ferrari.mst6.lanl.gov!newshost.lanl.gov!ncar!noao!math.arizona.edu!news.Arizona.EDU!news.Cerritos.edu!newshub.csu.net!usc!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in1.uu.net!spcuna!earth.njcc.com!pluto.njcc.com!jthomas From: jthomas@pluto.njcc.com (Jay) Newsgroups: comp.emulators.mac.executor Subject: Re: Executor usefulness? Date: 2 Dec 1995 22:49:36 GMT Organization: New Jersey Computer Connection, Lawrenceville, NJ Lines: 49 Message-ID: <49ql60$je0@earth.njcc.com> References: <49hrhc$vm@leepai.cs.purdue.edu> <h6ghgzlq5xc.fsf@frog.loc3.tandem.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: pluto.njcc.com To: executor@nacm.com X-MailNews-Gateway: From newsgroup comp.emulators.mac.executor Sender: owner-paper@nacm.com Precedence: bulk Dave Hwang <dhwang@loc3.tandem.com> writes: >>>>>> "Howii" == Howii <chenhh@cs.purdue.edu> writes: >In article <49hrhc$vm@leepai.cs.purdue.edu> chenhh@cs.purdue.edu writes: > Howii> Does anybody else question the usefulness of Executor? I like > Howii> macintoshes but have a PC and have used Executor, but I balk at > Howii> buying it because I never actually use a macintosh for any of my > Howii> important tasks these days. There was a time that I liked Macs > Howii> better for word processing, but these days, I'd rather use > Howii> windows programs because they are native to my machine (and thus > Howii> faster). > Howii> Also, Macs are moving to PowerPC these days... is Executor > Howii> planning on emulating that in the future? > Howii> This might sound pretty critical, but I tend to find that most > Howii> of the things I end up running are my old Mac shareware games. > Howii> Is there a major flaw in my line of reasoning? What ARDI really shoudl do is make a kickass x86 emulator for ppcs. :-) >Well, from what I've been following, the next generation of the >Executor's synthetic CPU is set up to be more portable to different >architectures. >I use Quicken 4 on my linux machine, but I'd love to have Executor >running on my sparc5 at work. I'd much rather have my Sparc+Executor >than two separate machines; one of which I use 95% of the time, and the >other just to use Excel. >I don't know about you guys, but I think Executor has a pretty good >future, and it's niche market can grow considerably. I think there must >be a lot of engineers in industry that use workstations most of the >time, but have to deal with a Mac or PC because the software only runs >on those platforms. I don't know about them, but personally, I'd love to >punt the Mac entirely. >Executor/Linux/DOS/NS is great, but ARDI probably thinks it's going to >be much more than that. >Dave Hwang >dhwang@loc3.tandem.com -- Freedom is not free. Free men are not equal. Equal men are not free. Microsoft Network is prohibited from redistributing this work in any form, in whole or in part. Copyright (c) 1995 Jay Thomas Jay Thomas, jthomas@pluto.njcc.com http://pluto.njcc.com/~jthomas