home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
Wrap
Received: from ftp.ardi.com (ftp.ardi.com [204.134.8.1]) by nacm.com (8.6.10/8.6.9) with SMTP id EAA28324 for <executor@nacm.com>; Mon, 4 Dec 1995 04:13:13 -0800 Received: from ardi.com by ftp.ardi.com (Smail3.1.29.1 #3) id m0tMZld-0007qBn; Mon, 4 Dec 95 05:13 MST Path: sloth.swcp.com!pagesat.net!news.uoregon.edu!chi-news.cic.net!news.math.psu.edu!news.cac.psu.edu!usenet From: Ericb@psu.edu (emb121 (Eric Bennett)) Newsgroups: comp.emulators.mac.executor Subject: Re: Executor usefulness? Date: 3 Dec 1995 16:49:29 GMT Organization: Penn State University, Center for Academic Computing Lines: 18 Message-ID: <49skep$r2q@hearst.cac.psu.edu> References: <49hrhc$vm@leepai.cs.purdue.edu> <atwood-2911951034090001@zehlendorf.stanford.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: emb121.rh.psu.edu X-Authinfo-User: emb121@psu.edu X-Posted-From: InterNews 1.0.8@emb121.rh.psu.edu X-Authenticated: emb121 on INN host hearst.cac.psu.edu To: executor@nacm.com X-MailNews-Gateway: From newsgroup comp.emulators.mac.executor Sender: owner-paper@nacm.com Precedence: bulk In article <atwood-2911951034090001@zehlendorf.stanford.edu> atwood@cs.stanford.edu (Scott Atwood) writes: > such as games or graphics/DTP, > where the Mac still has a foothold. I've seen Executor running on two or three machines, the latest being a Pentium 120. Executor on that machine is about as fast--near the speed of a 20 mhz 68040--as Apple's old 68k emulator on a 66 mhz PowerMac (Apple's new emulator is much faster). Unfortunately, while this is respectable processor emulation from Executor, its video speeds (under Linux Xwindows) on the machine I saw were pretty horrendous. I certainly wouldn't want to play arcade games in Executor. -Eric Bennett (ericb@psu.edu) Drawing on my fine command of the language, I said nothing. -Robert Benchley