home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
Wrap
Received: from ftp.ardi.com (ftp.ardi.com [204.134.8.1]) by nacm.com (8.6.10/8.6.9) with SMTP id VAA27236 for <executor@nacm.com>; Sun, 3 Dec 1995 21:13:44 -0800 Received: from ardi.com by ftp.ardi.com (Smail3.1.29.1 #3) id m0tMTDY-0007qAn; Sun, 3 Dec 95 22:13 MST Path: sloth.swcp.com!tesuque.cs.sandia.gov!ferrari.mst6.lanl.gov!newshost.lanl.gov!ncar!gatech!news.mathworks.com!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!warwick!news.shef.ac.uk!newsmaster@sheffield From: A.C.Pugh@shef.ac.uk (Andy the Pugh) Newsgroups: comp.emulators.mac.executor Subject: Re: Executor usefulness? Date: 1 Dec 1995 16:00:43 GMT Organization: Mechanical And Process Engineering, University of Sheffield , UK Lines: 22 Message-ID: <49n8rb$i41@hippo.shef.ac.uk> References: <49hrhc$vm@leepai.cs.purdue.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: pc057069.shef.ac.uk X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.92.1 To: executor@nacm.com X-MailNews-Gateway: From newsgroup comp.emulators.mac.executor Sender: owner-paper@nacm.com Precedence: bulk In article <49hrhc$vm@leepai.cs.purdue.edu>, chenhh@cs.purdue.edu (Howii) says: > >Does anybody else question the usefulness of Executor? I like >macintoshes but have a PC and have used Executor, but I balk at >buying it because I never actually use a macintosh for any of my >important tasks these days. There was a time that I liked Macs >better for word processing, but these days, I'd rather use windows >programs because they are native to my machine (and thus faster). > Is there a PC based plotting package as good as Kaliedagraph? That is what sterted my interest in Executor (and 1.99p6 seems to run it adequately, just not on my machine :-( ) ap