home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
Wrap
Received: from darkstar.urba.ulg.ac.be (darkstar.urba.ulg.ac.be [139.165.150.10]) by aix1.segi.ulg.ac.be (8.6.10/8.6.10) with SMTP id LAA59574 for <executor@nacm.com>; Sat, 18 Nov 1995 11:55:27 +0100 Received: by darkstar.urba.ulg.ac.be (NX5.67e/SMI 3.2/4.3) id AA00832; Sat, 18 Nov 95 11:51:29 +0100 Message-Id: <9511181051.AA00832@darkstar.urba.ulg.ac.be> Content-Type: text/plain Mime-Version: 1.0 (NeXT Mail 3.3 v118.2) Received: by NeXT.Mailer (1.118.2) From: Vincent Minder <vmin@urba.ulg.ac.be> Date: Sat, 18 Nov 95 11:51:20 +0100 To: executor@nacm.com Subject: Re: Reasons for using Executor... References: <UPMAIL04.199511181009040383@msn.com> Sender: owner-paper@nacm.com Precedence: bulk > I was just curious as to why executor users use executor? For those of us who chose a "no compromise" platform (NeXT) or operating system (NEXTSTEP for Intel) a while ago, Executor is (and is becoming more of) an extremely useful and exciting way to keep in touch with the "mainstream". This may be true to some extent for Linux or Warp users. My congratulations to the ARDI team, especially for their recent NEXTSTEP effort. I haven't had time to test it much, but E/NS 1.99p6 looks awesome. The GO interface is promising indeed (had heard much about it on this list, but never actually seen it). Please go on, we'll support you the best we can ! Vincent Minder