home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
Wrap
Received: from Devastator (dev@seminole.gate.net [199.227.0.14]) by tequesta.gate.net (8.6.9/8.6.9) with SMTP id QAA82766 for <executor@nacm.com>; Thu, 19 Oct 1995 16:52:10 -0400 Message-Id: <199510192052.QAA82766@tequesta.gate.net> X-Sender: dev@mailhost.gate.net X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 2.1.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Thu, 19 Oct 1995 16:55:28 +0900 To: executor@nacm.com From: Vladimir Mazek <dev@gate.net> Subject: ARDI legal stuff Sender: owner-paper@nacm.com Precedence: bulk I believe Cliff wrote about this before, but I still don't get it completely. I don't understand why ardi is doing everything from the ground up (reinventing the wheel)? I know that apple would sue you if you took the code completely, but aren't you even allowed to take "snippets" of code and modify them to run on the IBM compatibles. Would they have any way of figuring out what you did?