home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
Wrap
Received: from hopi.gate.net (salernof@hopi.gate.net [199.227.0.13]) by tequesta.gate.net (8.6.9/8.6.9) with ESMTP id WAA52608; Sun, 1 Oct 1995 22:30:53 -0400 Received: (from salernof@localhost) by hopi.gate.net (8.6.9/8.6.9) id WAA60425; Sun, 1 Oct 1995 22:30:38 -0400 Date: Sun, 1 Oct 1995 22:30:38 -0400 (EDT) From: Fred Salerno <salernof@gate.net> To: Tommy Tran <ttt_42@mail.utexas.edu> cc: executor@nacm.com Subject: Re: HFV slow In-Reply-To: <199510020021.TAA14856@smtp.utexas.edu> Message-ID: <Pine.A32.3.91.951001223008.37558A-100000@hopi.gate.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-paper@nacm.com Precedence: bulk Have you tried a simple disk cache? I noticed SMARTDRV C+ 500 500 makes a difference when creating HFV files. On Sun, 1 Oct 1995, Tommy Tran wrote: > Is it me, or is MAKEHFV slow. This is the first time I have used it, > and it seems to sit there when creating a 10MB "hd". > > I am also using it in DOS, is there any way to use it in the > Executor Shell. > > -Tommy Tran > ttt_42@mail.utexas.edu >