home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
Wrap
Received: from localhost.lightside.com (user48.lightside.com [198.81.209.48]) by nacm.com (8.6.10/8.6.9) with ESMTP id XAA00423 for <executor@nacm.com>; Sun, 17 Sep 1995 23:38:29 -0700 Received: (from jehamby@localhost) by localhost.lightside.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) id XAA00397; Sun, 17 Sep 1995 23:39:09 -0700 Date: Sun, 17 Sep 1995 23:38:44 -0700 (PDT) From: Jake Hamby <jehamby@lightside.com> X-Sender: jehamby@localhost To: Brian Hawley <bhawley@luc.edu> cc: executor@nacm.com Subject: Re: Executor in the movies! In-Reply-To: <199509180249.VAA49576@orion.it.luc.edu> Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.950917233645.388A-100000@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-paper@nacm.com Precedence: bulk On Sun, 17 Sep 1995, Brian Hawley wrote: > Hi all! > > I just saw the movie "Hackers" and I think they were using Executor. One of > them mentioned that they had an Intel P6 laptop (now where did they get that > in '95?), and later they showed them using Mac graphics on that same > machine. How else could they have done that except for using Executor? > Perhaps we should ask them how they got the modem and network support working! > > Just reporting the news as I see it! > Brian Hawley > bhawley@luc.edu > A movie studio using Executor? Not bloody likely... From what I've heard of "Hackers", they basically just threw stuff in that looked or sounded cool, without regard to whether or not it was actually POSSIBLE! And with a laptop, whose screen would probably not be visible under the bright lights of the movie cameras, they probably just edited in a fake screen from a Mac, not caring that they had already claimed it to be a PC. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jake Hamby | E-Mail: jehamby@lightside.com Student, Cal Poly University, Pomona | System Administrator, JPL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------