home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
Wrap
Received: from sloth.swcp.com (sloth.swcp.com [198.59.115.25]) by nacm.com (8.6.10/8.6.9) with ESMTP id QAA25839 for <executor@nacm.com>; Sat, 22 Jul 1995 16:56:57 -0700 Received: from iclone.UUCP (uucp@localhost) by sloth.swcp.com (8.6.9/8.6.9) with UUCP id RAA01465; Sat, 22 Jul 1995 17:56:38 -0600 Received: from beaut.ardi.com by mailhost with smtp (nextstep Smail3.1.29.0 #11) id m0sZoM0-000YbhC; Sat, 22 Jul 95 17:53 MDT Received: by beaut.ardi.com (linux Smail3.1.28.1 #5) id m0sZoLz-00005nC; Sat, 22 Jul 95 17:53 MDT Message-Id: <m0sZoLz-00005nC@beaut.ardi.com> Date: Sat, 22 Jul 95 17:53 MDT From: ctm@ardi.com (Clifford Thomas Matthews) To: halv0019@gold.tc.umn.edu Cc: gnats@ardi.com, executor@nacm.com Subject: Re: Printing on E/L In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.91.950723014322.3626A-100000@Ika.umn.edu> References: <m0sZmK9-00005nC@beaut.ardi.com> <Pine.LNX.3.91.950723014322.3626A-100000@Ika.umn.edu> Sender: owner-paper@nacm.com Precedence: bulk >>>>> "Jeff" == Jeff Halverson <jeff@umn.edu> writes: Jeff> Hello, Does anyone get decent printouts from E/L? I think I Jeff> might not really be= =20 set up right for it, either that or Jeff> E/L doesn't do the right thing. (I=20 tend to think it may Jeff> just be my problem, though)... ... Jeff> It actually is the latest version (1.99o E/L). Let me know Jeff> if it works on your setup in house... oh, and thanks for Jeff> telling me about my mailer-- I guess I'll have to find out Jeff> how to not get it to send as "Quoted Printable".. Ack. You're right, it looks pretty bad. A quick glance at the output shows these bugs: weird word placement and line breaking (suggesting that there is a problem measuring the text, and that it's *not* purely a font substitution problem) improperly placed graphics in "pictures" in the document (e.g. the Tex-Edit icon on the first page, the overstriking in the table of contents) the last portion of the manual isn't printed out I believe that those three bugs explain all the badness in the Tex-Edit Reference Executor printed output. I'll look into them fairly soon. Different programs may have other bugs. I think Word output prints fairly well if you have fractional widths enabled. --Cliff ctm@ardi.com