home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- X-Sender: root@Ender.cyberspace.com
- To: executor@nacm.com
- Subject: VESA 2.0 or accelX?
- Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.3.91.950717132525.81A-100000@Ender.cyberspace.com>
- Mime-Version: 1.0
- Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
- Sender: owner-paper@nacm.com
- Precedence: bulk
-
- Hello,
-
- I have a P5-90 with a ATI mach64 video card and am wondering whether
- I will get better performance from Executor from DOS with univesa loaded,
- or through my accelerated X server. Is there any noticable differences
- between the two? I noticed the mach64 doesn't have the infamous white
- border that plagues other video cards, so those little annoyances don't
- bother me, I'm just interested in which configuration I should use for
- the most speed/usability...
-
- +=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=+=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=+
- | Jared Roberts | Ultima Dragons: Internet Chapter |
- | mailto:Jared@cyberspace.com | Timeless Dragon -==(UDIC)==- |
- | Jarobert@sparky.lkwash.wednet.edu +=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=+
- | Orion@media.mediawhse.com | Orion@IRC |
- +=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=+=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=+
-
-
-