Received: from emout04.mail.aol.com (emout04.mail.aol.com [198.81.10.12]) by nacm.com (8.6.10/8.6.9) with ESMTP id FAA29875 for <executor@nacm.com>; Fri, 7 Jul 1995 05:25:12 -0700
From: LastGamer@aol.com
Received: by emout04.mail.aol.com
(1.37.109.11/16.2) id AA050209708; Fri, 7 Jul 1995 08:21:48 -0400
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 1995 08:21:48 -0400
Message-Id: <950707082124_109738397@aol.com>
To: executor@nacm.com
Subject: E/D 1.99n
Sender: owner-paper@nacm.com
Precedence: bulk
1.99n works great. The VESA 2.0 support seems to work flawlessly. Using
results from Speedometer 3.23 I discovered Executor runs faster under Windows
3.1 than when I boot and run it from a "clean" DOS session. I was just
wondering how this was possible and if I should trust the results under
Windows. Normally Windows make DOS apps behave slow and screwy.