Received: from panix.com (panix.com [198.7.0.2]) by nacm.com (8.6.10/8.6.9) with ESMTP id JAA19671 for <executor@nacm.com>; Wed, 5 Jul 1995 09:05:31 -0700
Received: (from davidb@localhost) by panix.com (8.6.12/8.6.12+PanixU1.1) id LAA02929; Wed, 5 Jul 1995 11:44:21 -0400
From: David Besonen <davidb@panix.com>
Message-Id: <199507051544.LAA02929@panix.com>
Subject: Re: support for more cd-rom drive letters?
To: ctm@ardi.com (Clifford Thomas Matthews)
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 1995 11:44:20 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: davidb@panix.com, executor@nacm.com
In-Reply-To: <m0sTWGd-00000BC@beaut.ardi.com> from "Clifford Thomas Matthews" at Jul 5, 95 09:21:00 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 772
Sender: owner-paper@nacm.com
Precedence: bulk
5 jul 95
> David> is there any chance executor/dos will ever support cd-rom
> David> drive letters beyond h:?
>
> I believe CD-ROMs up to and including J work. That's what I just put
> in our FAQ, so please let me know if this isn't the case.
i tried j: and couldn't get executor to access the cd-rom drive.
i didn't try i:, but i did try h: and that worked ok.
> David> this is a big problem for me since i'm forced to use up all
> David> my low drive letters on my hard drives.
>
> We can probably adjust this to be higher, although if I and J aren't
> working currently, I don't know what we'll do, since the way we'd
> extend it is the same way we get up to J (or at least we think we do)
