home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
Wrap
Received: from mercury.unt.edu (mercury.unt.edu [129.120.1.1]) by nacm.com (8.6.10/8.6.9) with SMTP id HAA01970 for <executor@nacm.com>; Tue, 20 Jun 1995 07:25:27 -0700 Received: from soliton.phys.unt.edu by mercury.unt.edu with SMTP id AA09753 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for <executor@nacm.com>); Tue, 20 Jun 1995 09:25:21 -0500 Received: by soliton.phys.unt.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA08296; Tue, 20 Jun 95 09:20:05 CDT Date: Tue, 20 Jun 95 09:20:05 CDT From: dcurry@soliton.phys.unt.edu (David Curry) Message-Id: <9506201420.AA08296@soliton.phys.unt.edu> To: ctm@ardi.com, vsouth@primenet.com Subject: Re: Executor Recommendation Cc: executor@nacm.com Sender: owner-paper@nacm.com Precedence: bulk Veeder> Until a fully tested, fully feature-implimented version Veeder> comes out, the ten minute limit would not work and get me Veeder> to buy Executor. I would like to add that development costs money! If there exists reasonable evidence that 2.0 will be useful to you, then you should pay for the pre-release version. This benefits both parties because ARDI gets bug reports and some finances and you will get a more stable 2.0 (and get it quicker). It is not very productive for programmers to spend half their time scrounging for financial support! David Curry Center for Nonlinear Sciences Department of Physics University of North Texas