home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
Wrap
Received: from earth.execpc.com (earth.execpc.com [204.29.202.50]) by execpc.com (8.6.12/8.6.11) with ESMTP id JAA12052; Tue, 6 Jun 1995 09:59:19 -0500 Received: (from olaugh@localhost) by earth.execpc.com (8.6.12/8.6.11) id JAA02933; Tue, 6 Jun 1995 09:56:27 -0500 From: "Thomas O'Laughlin" <olaugh@earth.execpc.com> Message-Id: <199506061456.JAA02933@earth.execpc.com> Subject: Re: Benchmark To: g.sightler@genie.geis.com Date: Tue, 6 Jun 1995 09:56:26 -0500 (CDT) Cc: executor@nacm.com In-Reply-To: <199506060152.AA012423546@relay1.geis.com> from "g.sightler@genie.geis.com" at Jun 6, 95 01:39:00 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 561 Sender: owner-paper@nacm.com Precedence: bulk > > Is there any way to benchmark this emulation? I tried Speedometer 4.0, but > according to it my 486/66 is running at .006 times as fast as a Quadra 605 > (or something like that, I forget exactly which Quadra it was <g>). > > I'm wondering if there some particular reason that the benchmark is showing > up that bad, because I know that the emulation is not really THAT slow. :) > > ||||| Jesse D. Sightler ||||| > Speedometer 3.23 runs perfectly under Executor. My 486 DX/4 is equivalent to a Mac IIci. Speedometer 4.0 won't even start for me.