home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
Wrap
Received: from ppsw3.cam.ac.uk (mauve.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.38]) by nacm.com (8.6.10/8.6.9) with ESMTP id AAA06801 for <executor@nacm.com>; Thu, 4 May 1995 00:41:25 -0700 Received: from mole.bio.cam.ac.uk by mauve.csi.cam.ac.uk with SMTP-CAM (XTPP8.1) as ppsw.cam.ac.uk; Thu, 4 May 1995 08:40:09 +0100 Received: from localhost by mole.bio.cam.ac.uk (931110.SGI/MDTG-V1.3@mole.bio.cam.ac.uk) id AA12011; Thu, 4 May 95 08:44:19 +0100 Message-Id: <9505040744.AA12011@mole.bio.cam.ac.uk> To: executor@nacm.com Subject: Re: To users of Exec199m-Dos for NIH-Image In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 03 May 1995 20:04:12 -0000." <v01510100abcd91995bca@[137.73.52.103]> Date: Thu, 04 May 1995 08:44:18 +0100 From: Tim Cutts (Zoology) <tjrc1@mole.bio.cam.ac.uk> Sender: owner-executor@nacm.com Precedence: bulk In your message (Wed, 3 May 1995 20:04:12 +0000), you wrote: >>> >>> I am having problems using Exec199m (and 199l) for the application NIH-Imag >e. >>> I would like to generate a dialogue for those who are using that app. >>> >>> I have yet to find a stable configuration for Exec that allows me to run th >e >>> Image program (which is Image 1.55). >>> >>> COuld someone who has successfully loaded Image rsvp with their configurati >on >>> for exec. If others have had problems with this program specifically, could >>> we hear about them so I do not have to feel so dumb after reading about al >l >>> those successful uses of Exec for fun and games (which I do not care about) >. >>> >>I have installed NIHimage 1.55 "successfully". It doesn't kill me that >>offen. But many of the functions work only under system 7.x ( don't >>remmember now which). I have oppened gray images it goes just fine but I >>have problem with collor images: it mixes >>Regards Mehran > > > >I have had the same problem. Version 1.55 works fine in B&W but colour >LUT's get completely screwed up. Also, it seems to swap 0 and 255 ie. >black goes to white etc. > >Anyone know how to get rid of the diagonal wallpaper in 1.99m? Does this happen even if you use -privatecmap? Tim.