home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- In-Reply-To: <9505031134.AA15046@mole.bio.cam.ac.uk>
- Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.3.91.950503153511.13864A-100000@Kay-Abernathy.tenet.edu>
- MIME-Version: 1.0
- Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
- Sender: owner-executor@nacm.com
- Precedence: bulk
-
-
-
- On Wed, 3 May 1995, Tim Cutts wrote:
-
- > In your message (Tue, 2 May 95 23:54 MDT), Mat wrote:
- > >>>>>> "Silvia" == Silvia J Pena <sjppena@tenet.edu> writes:
- > >
- > > Silvia> Dear Executor, Will the demo version of Executor for DOS,
- > > Silvia> ver. 1.99m run faster on 386's than the 1.99l version? The
- > > Silvia> 1.99f version seem to have ran pretty fast on a 386SX/16
- > > Silvia> Mhz PC. I just hope that 1.99m would run fast. I like the
- > > Silvia> Go GUI. Do you have any separate binaries that run on a
- > > Silvia> Mac. Thanks. Sincerely, Joseph R. Pena
- > >
- > >1.99m shouldn't be much faster than 1.99l, although the annoying
- > >flicker is gone. I am currently working on speeding up graphics
- > >performance significantly, but that won't be present for another
- > >release or two.
- > >
- > >I'm not sure what you mean by "separate binaries that run on a Mac",
- > >but you can run Executor's browser on a Mac if you want to.
- >
- > Can you? It crashes on my Mac Classic in a fairly serious way...
- >
- > Tim.
- >
- >
- >
- >
- What I meant by separate binaries was like in a format that the original
- GO was in. Is there a program for a Mac that replaces the Finder.
-
-