home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
Wrap
Received: from ppsw3.cam.ac.uk (mauve.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.38]) by nacm.com (8.6.10/8.6.9) with ESMTP id EAA17477 for <executor@nacm.com>; Wed, 3 May 1995 04:31:16 -0700 Received: from mole.bio.cam.ac.uk by mauve.csi.cam.ac.uk with SMTP-CAM (XTPP8.1) as ppsw.cam.ac.uk; Wed, 3 May 1995 12:30:21 +0100 Received: from localhost by mole.bio.cam.ac.uk (931110.SGI/MDTG-V1.3@mole.bio.cam.ac.uk) id AA15046; Wed, 3 May 95 12:34:41 +0100 Message-Id: <9505031134.AA15046@mole.bio.cam.ac.uk> To: executor@nacm.com Subject: Re: Executor for DOS, ver. 1.99m demo In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 02 May 1995 23:54:00 MDT." <m0s6XNs-000GOeC@gwar.ardi.com> Date: Wed, 03 May 1995 12:34:41 +0100 From: Tim Cutts (Zoology) <tjrc1@mole.bio.cam.ac.uk> Sender: owner-executor@nacm.com Precedence: bulk In your message (Tue, 2 May 95 23:54 MDT), Mat wrote: >>>>>> "Silvia" == Silvia J Pena <sjppena@tenet.edu> writes: > > Silvia> Dear Executor, Will the demo version of Executor for DOS, > Silvia> ver. 1.99m run faster on 386's than the 1.99l version? The > Silvia> 1.99f version seem to have ran pretty fast on a 386SX/16 > Silvia> Mhz PC. I just hope that 1.99m would run fast. I like the > Silvia> Go GUI. Do you have any separate binaries that run on a > Silvia> Mac. Thanks. Sincerely, Joseph R. Pena > >1.99m shouldn't be much faster than 1.99l, although the annoying >flicker is gone. I am currently working on speeding up graphics >performance significantly, but that won't be present for another >release or two. > >I'm not sure what you mean by "separate binaries that run on a Mac", >but you can run Executor's browser on a Mac if you want to. Can you? It crashes on my Mac Classic in a fairly serious way... Tim.