> Would it be possible/advantageous to make executor internally
> multi-threaded? Code recompilation on one thread, gfx on one and disk
> IO on another?
Are you referring to the kernel-space threads avaialable in OS/2? I
don't know anything about the Executor code, but I imagine that if ARDI
were to thread the code (if it is not), they would use some more portable
user-space thread system, perhaps POSIX threads.
Hm. No messages from Cliff to this list in the past two hours. He
must be resting or something. Judging by the traffic on this list recently,
it was starting to look like he didn't do that. :-)
--Jered
P.S. I've modified the setup on vorlon to fix two potential problems. If
anyone has any problems with ftp to vorlon, please mail me.
From owner-executor Sat Apr 8 22:24:21 1995
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by nacm.com (8.6.10/8.6.9) id WAA29273 for executor-outgoing; Sat, 8 Apr 1995 22:24:21 -0700
Received: from MIT.EDU (SOUTH-STATION-ANNEX.MIT.EDU [18.72.1.2]) by nacm.com (8.6.10/8.6.9) with SMTP id WAA29268 for <executor@nacm.com>; Sat, 8 Apr 1995 22:24:13 -0700
Received: from VORLON.MIT.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTP
id AA08925; Sun, 9 Apr 95 01:24:11 EDT
Received: from localhost by vorlon.mit.edu (8.6.9/4.7) id BAA07668; Sun, 9 Apr 1995 01:24:11 -0400