Received: from mailhost.viewlogic.com (mailhost.viewlogic.com [139.181.3.35]) by nacm.com (8.6.9/8.6.9) with SMTP id NAA07160 for <executor@nacm.com>; Thu, 22 Dec 1994 13:03:48 -0800
Received: from hari by mailhost.viewlogic.com (5.0/SMI-4.1)
id AA27048; Thu, 22 Dec 1994 15:59:43 +0500
From: sfoskett@viewlogic.com (Stephen Foskett)
Received: by hari (4.1) id AA03128; Thu, 22 Dec 94 16:03:09 EST
Message-Id: <9412222103.AA03128@hari>
Subject: Re: Executor demo 1.99b on a 386SX-25 !!!!!!!
To: thudoba@d.umn.edu (Tim Hudoba)
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 1994 16:03:08 -0500 (EST)
Cc: executor@nacm.com
In-Reply-To: <199412221738.LAA20547@ub.d.umn.edu> from "Tim Hudoba" at Dec 22, 94 11:38:00 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 1121
Sender: owner-executor@nacm.com
Precedence: bulk
> I was just goofing around and showing a budy of mine the latest executor demo
> (for dos) on one of our schools 386sx-25 pc's. And I have to say that
> besides all the lockups (happens commonly with these pc's) executor ran
> supprisingly fast. I'm impressed, GOOD JOB GUYS!! It's too bad that I can't
I too have been known to run Executor on my old Dell 386SX20 laptop...
It's just about usable even there!
> Also I have a question (or two) for any guru out there.
>
> Will Executor work on a device driven Enhanced IDE HDD?
Yes. I experiment with Executor mainly on my work PC, a 486DX2-66
with a PCI EIDE controller to a Western Digital EIDE 740meg HD.
Believe me, the hard disk tests are REALLY fast on this combo!!!
.s.
(I'd be surprise if your .sig hasn't found its was to alt.fan.warlord
