home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
Text File | 1996-10-08 | 63.9 KB | 1,614 lines |
- Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.domains,comp.answers,news.answers
- Path: informatik.tu-muenchen.de!Germany.EU.net!main.Germany.EU.net!EU.net!news.mathworks.com!news.sgi.com!rutgers!njitgw.njit.edu!hertz.njit.edu!cdp2582
- From: cdp2582@hertz.njit.edu (Chris Peckham)
- Subject: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.domains Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) (Part 1 of 2)
- Message-ID: <cptd-faq-1-844662719@njit.edu>
- Followup-To: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.domains
- Originator: cdp2582@hertz.njit.edu
- Keywords: BIND,DOMAIN,DNS
- Sender: news@njit.edu
- Supersedes: <cptd-faq-1-841897014@njit.edu>
- Nntp-Posting-Host: hertz.njit.edu
- X-Posting-Frequency: posted during the first week of each month
- Reply-To: domain-faq@njit.edu (comp.protocols.tcp-ip.domains FAQ comments)
- Organization: NJIT.EDU - New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, USA
- Date: Mon, 7 Oct 1996 04:32:02 GMT
- Approved: news-answers-request@MIT.EDU
- Expires: Mon 11 Nov 96 00:31:59 EDT
- Lines: 1593
- Xref: informatik.tu-muenchen.de comp.protocols.tcp-ip.domains:14350 comp.answers:21515 news.answers:83576
-
- Posted-By: auto-faq 3.1.1.2
- Archive-name: internet/tcp-ip/domains-faq/part1
- Revision: 1.12 1996/09/05 04:16:19
-
-
- This FAQ is edited and maintained by Chris Peckham, <cdp@pfmc.net>.
- The latest version may always be found for anonymous ftp from
-
- ftp://rtfm.mit.edu/pub/usenet/news.answers/internet/tcp-ip/domains-faq
-
- If you can contribute any answers for items in the TODO section, please do
- so by sending e-mail to domain-faq@pfmc.net ! If you know of any items that
- are not included and you feel that they should be, send the relevant
- information to domain-faq@pfmc.net.
-
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Wed Sep 4 23:45:28 EDT 1996
- Subject: Table of Contents
-
- Table of Contents
- =================
- Part 1
- ------
- 0. TO DO / UPDATES
- 1. INTRODUCTION / MISCELLANEOUS
- 1.1 What is this newsgroup ?
- 1.2 More information
- 1.3 What is BIND and where is the latest version of BIND ?
- 1.4 How can I find the route between systems ?
- 1.5 Finding the hostname if you have the tcp-ip address
- 1.6 How to register a domain name
- 1.7 Change IP of primary name server
- 1.8 Change of Domain name
- 1.9 How memory and CPU does DNS use ?
- 1.10 Other things to consider when planning your servers
- 1.11 Proper way to get NS and reverse IP records into DNS
- 1.12 How to get my address assigned from the NIC ?
- 1.13 Is there a block of private IP addresses I can use?
- 1.14 Cache failed lookups
- 1.15 What does an NS record really do ?
- 1.16 DNS ports
- 1.17 Obtaining the latest cache file
- 1.18 Selecting a nameserver/root cache
- 1.19 InterNIC and domain names
- 2. UTILITIES
- 2.1 Utilities to administer DNS zone files
- 2.2 DIG - Domain Internet Groper
- 2.3 DNS packet analyzer
- 2.4 host
- 2.5 Programming with DNS
- 2.6 A source of information relating to DNS
- 3. DEFINITIONS
- 3.1 TCP/IP Host Naming Conventions
- 3.2 Slaves and servers with forwarders
- 3.3 When is a server authoritative?
- 3.4 Underscore in host-/domain names
- 3.5 Lame delegation
- 3.6 What does opt-class field do?
- 3.7 Top level domains
- 3.8 Classes of networks
- 3.9 What is CIDR ?
- 3.10 What is the rule for glue ?
-
- Part 2
- ------
- 4. CONFIGURATION
- 4.1 Changing a Secondary server to a Primary and moving Primary
- 4.2 How do I subnet a Class B Address ?
- 4.3 Subnetted domain name service
- 4.4 Recommended format/style of DNS files
- 4.5 DNS on a system not connected to the Internet
- 4.6 Multiple Domain configuration
- 4.7 wildcard MX records
- 4.8 How to identify a wildcard MX record
- 4.9 Why are fully qualified domain names recommended ?
- 4.10 Distributing load using named
- 4.11 Order of returned records
- 4.12 resolv.conf
- 4.13 Delegating authority
- 4.14 DNS instead of NIS on a Sun OS 4.1.x system
- 4.15 Patches to add functionality to BIND
- 4.16 How to serve multiple domains from one server
- 5. PROBLEMS
- 5.1 No address for root server
- 5.2 Error - No Root Nameservers for Class XX
- 5.3 Bind 4.9.x and MX querying?
- 5.4 Some root nameservers don't know localhost
- 5.5 MX records and CNAMES and separate A records for MX targets
- 5.6 NS is a CNAME
- 5.7 Nameserver forgets own A record
- 5.8 General problems (core dumps !)
- 5.9 malloc and DECstations
- 5.10 Can't resolve names without a "."
- 5.11 Err/TO errors being reported
- 5.12 Why does swapping kill BIND ?
- 6. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Sun Oct 6 23:23:59 EDT 1996
- Subject: Q0 - TO DO / UPDATES
-
- TO DO
- * Expand the slave/forward section of Q 3.2
-
- UPDATES / Changes since last FAQ
- Q1.2 - Added three news comp.protocols.dns newsgroups
-
-
- -------------------------------
-
- Date: Thu Dec 1 11:08:28 EST 1994
- Subject: Q1.1 - What is this newsgroup ?
-
- comp.protocols.tcp-ip.domains is the usenet newsgroup for discussion
- on issues relating to the Domain Name System (DNS).
-
- This newsgroup is not for issues directly relating to IP routing and
- addressing. Issues of that nature should be directed towards
- comp.protocols.tcp-ip.
-
-
- -------------------------------
-
-
- Date: Sun Oct 6 23:30:14 EDT 1996
- Subject: Q1.2 - More information
-
- You can find more information concerning DNS in the following places:
-
- * The BOG (BIND Operations Guide) - in the BIND distribution
- * The FAQ included with BIND 4.9.4 in doc/misc/FAQ
- * DNS and BIND by Albitz and Liu (an O'Reilly & Associates Nutshell
- handbook)
- * A number of RFCs (920, 974, 1032, 1034, 1101, 1123, 1178, 1183, 1348,
- 1535, 1536, 1537, 1591, 1706, 1712, 1713, 1912, 1918)
- * The DNS Resources Directory (DNSRD)
- http://www.dns.net/dnsrd/
- * If you are having troubles relating to sendmail and DNS, you may wish to
- refer to the USEnet newsgroup comp.mail.sendmail and/or the FAQ for that
- newsgroup
- ftp://rtfm.mit.edu/pub/usenet/news.answers/mail/sendmail-faq
- * Information concerning some frequently asked questions relating to
- the Internet (i.e., what is the InterNIC, what is an RFC, what is the
- IETF, etc) may be found for anonymous ftp from
- ftp://ds.internic.net/fyi/fyi4.txt
- A version may also be obtained with the URL
- gopher://ds.internic.net/00/fyi/fyi4.txt
- * Information on performing an initial installation of BIND may be
- found using the DNS Resources Directory at
- http://www.dns.net/dnsrd/docs/basic.txt
- * Three other USEnet newsgroups:
- comp.protocols.dns.bind
- comp.protocols.dns.ops
- comp.protocols.dns.std
-
-
- -------------------------------
-
- Date: Tue Sep 10 23:15:58 EDT 1996
- Subject: Q1.3 - What is BIND and where is the latest version of BIND ?
-
- Q: What is BIND ?
-
- A: From the BOG Introduction -
-
- The Berkeley Internet Name Domain (BIND) implements
- an Internet name server for the BSD operating system.
- The BIND consists of a server (or ``daemon'') and a
- resolver library. A name server is a network service
- that enables clients to name resources or objects and
- share this information with other objects in the network.
- This in effect is a distributed data base system for
- objects in a computer network. BIND is fully integrated
- into BSD (4.3 and later releases) network programs for
- use in storing and retrieving host names and address.
- The system administrator can configure the system to use
- BIND as a replacement to the older host table lookup of
- information in the network hosts file /etc/hosts. The
- default configuration for BSD uses BIND.
-
- Q: What is the difference between BIND (an implementation) and DNS (the
- specification) ?
-
- A: (text provided by Andras Salamon) DNS is the Domain Name System, a set
- of protocols for a distributed database that was originally designed
- to replace /etc/hosts files. DNS is most commonly used by applications
- to translate domain names of hosts to IP addresses. A client of the DNS
- is called a resolver; resolvers are typically located in the application
- layer of the networking software of each TCP/IP capable machine. Users
- typically do not interact directly with the resolver. Resolvers query
- the DNS by directing queries at name servers that contain parts of the
- distributed database that is accessed by using the DNS protocols. In
- common usage, `the DNS' usually refers just to the data in the
- database.
-
- BIND (Berkeley Internet Name Domain) is an implementation of DNS, both
- server and client. Development of BIND is funded by the Internet Software
- Consortium and is coordinated by Paul Vixie. BIND has been ported to
- Windows NT and VMS, but is most often found on Unix. BIND source code
- is freely available and very complex; most of the development on the DNS
- protocols is based on this code; and most Unix vendors ship BIND-derived
- DNS implementations. As a result, the BIND name server is the most widely
- used name server on the Internet. In common usage, `BIND' usually refers
- to the name server that is part of the BIND distribution, and sometimes
- to name servers in general (whether BIND-derived or not).
-
- Q: Where is the latest version of BIND located ?
-
- A: You can reference this URL:
-
- http://www.vixie.com/isc/bind.html
-
- At this time, BIND version of 4.9.4 may be found for anonymous ftp
- from
-
- ftp://ftp.vix.com/pub/bind/release/4.9.4/bind-4.9.4-P1.tar.gz
-
- What's in 4.9.4 that wasn't in 4.9.3-P1:
-
- 1. IPv6 AAAA RRs can be resolved, loaded, dumped, transferred, and
- cached
- 2. The CERT bulletin regarding bad host names has been dealt with
- 3. Numerous bug fixes that were going to go into 4.9.3-P2 anyway
-
- Other sites that officially mirror the BIND distribution are
- ftp://bind.fit.qut.edu.au/pub/bind
- ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/unix/tcpip/dns/bind
- ftp://ftp.univ-lyon1.fr/pub/mirrors/unix/bind
- ftp://ftp.oleane.net/pub/mirrors/unix/bind
- ftp://ftp.ucr.ac.cr/pub/Unix/dns/bind
- ftp://ftp.luth.se/pub/unix/dns/bind/beta
-
- You may need GNU zip, Larry Wall's patch program (if there are any
- patch files), and a C compiler to get BIND running from the above
- mentioned source.
-
- GNU zip is available for anonymous ftp from
-
- ftp://prep.ai.mit.edu/pub/gnu/gzip-1.2.4.tar
-
- patch is available for anonymous ftp from
-
- ftp://prep.ai.mit.edu/pub/gnu/patch-2.1.tar.gz
-
- A version for Windows NT is available for anonymous ftp from
-
- ftp://ftp.vix.com/pub/bind/release/4.9.4/contrib/ntdns494p1bin.zip
- and
- ftp://ftp.vix.com/pub/bind/release/4.9.4/contrib/ntbind494p1.zip
-
-
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Mon Jan 2 13:27:27 EST 1995
- Subject: Q1.4 - How can I find the route between systems
-
- Q: How can I find the path taken by packets between two systems/domains ?
-
- A: Get the source of the 'traceroute' command, compile it and install
- it on your system.
-
- One version of this program with additional functionality may be found
- for anonymous ftp from
-
- ftp://ftp.nikhef.nl/pub/network/traceroute.tar.Z
-
- Another version may be found for anonymous ftp from
-
- ftp://ftp.psc.edu/pub/net_tools/traceroute.tar
-
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Thu Dec 1 09:55:24 EST 1994
- Subject: Q1.5 - Finding the hostname if you have the tcp-ip address
-
- Q: Can someone tell me how can I find the name of the domain if I know the
- tcp-ip address of the domain? Is there some kind of service for this?
-
- A: For an address a.b.c.d you can always do:
-
- % nslookup
- > set q=ptr
- > d.c.b.a.in-addr.arpa.
-
- Most newer version of nslookup (since 4.8.3) will recognize an address,
- so you can just say:
-
- % nslookup a.b.c.d
-
- DiG will work like this also:
-
- $ dig -x a.b.c.d
-
- Host from the contrib/host from the bind distribution may also be used.
-
- -------------------------------
-
- Date: Wed Sep 4 23:59:42 EDT 1996
- Subject: Q1.6 - How to register a domain name
-
- Q: I would like to register a domain. How do I do this ? Can a name be
- reserved, or must we already have an IP address and be hooked up to the
- Internet before obtaining a domain name?
-
- A: You can talk to your Internet Service Provider (ISP). They can submit
- the registration for you. If you are not going to be directly
- connected, they should be able to offer MX records for your domain
- for mail delivery (so that mail sent to the new domain will be sent
- to your "standard" account). In the case where the registration is
- done by the organization itself, it still makes the whole process
- much easier if the ISP is approached for secondary servers _before_
- the InterNIC is approached for registration.
-
- For information about making the registration yourself, look to the
- InterNIC !
-
- ftp://internic.net/templates/
- gopher://rs.internic.net/
- http://rs.internic.net/reg/reg-forms.html
- http://www.ripe.net/
-
- You will need at least two domain name servers when you register your
- domain. Many ISP's are willing to provide primary and/or secondary name
- service for their customers.
-
- Please note that the InterNIC is now charging a fee for domain names
- in the "COM", "ORG", and "NET". More information may be found from
- the Internic at
- http://rs.internic.net/domain-info/fee-policy.html
-
- Many times, registration of a domain name can be initiated by sending
- e-mail to the zone contact. You can obtain the contact in the
- SOA record for the country, or in a whois server:
-
- $ nslookup -type=SOA fr.
- origin = ns1.nic.fr
- mail addr = nic.nic.fr
- ...
-
- The mail address to contact in this case is 'nic@nic.fr' (you must
- substitute an '@' for the first dot in the mail addr field).
-
- An alternate method to obtain the e-mail address of the national NIC
- is the 'whois' server at InterNIC.
-
- You may be requested to make your request to another email address or
- using a certain information template/application.
-
-
- -------------------------------
-
- Date: Sun May 5 22:46:28 EDT 1996
- Subject: 1.7 - Change IP of primary name server
-
- Q: We are going to change IP of primary name server. (with the same
- machine but attach to another network). Our server serves as a
- primary server for many domains. How can we do this as smoothly
- as possible ?
-
- A: (From Mark Andrews)
-
- Before the move.
-
- 1. Ensure you are running a modern nameserver. BIND 4.9.3-REL +
- Patch1 is a good choice.
- 2. Inform all your secondaries that you are going to change.
- Have them install both the current and new addresses in
- their named.boot's.
- 3. Drop the ttl of the A's associated with the nameserver to
- something small (5 min is usually good).
- 4. Drop the refesh and retry times of the zone containing the
- forward records for the server.
- 5. Configure the new reverse zone before the move and make sure
- it is operational.
-
- * On the day of the move add the new A record(s) for the server.
- Don't forget to have these added to parent domains. You will
- look like you are multihomed with one interface dead.
- * Move the machine after gracefully terminating any other services
- it is offering.
- * Fixup the A's, ttl, refresh and retry counters. (If you are running
- an all server EDIT out all references to the old addresses in the
- cache files).
- * Inform all the secondaries the move is complete.
- * Inform the parents of all zones you are primary of the new NS/A
- pairs for the relevent zones.
- * Inform all the administators of zones you are secondaring that
- the machine has moved.
- * For good measure update the serial no for all zones you are
- primary for. This will flush out old A's.
-
-
- -------------------------------
-
- Date: Sun Nov 27 23:32:41 EST 1994
- Subject: Q1.8 - Change of Domain name
-
- Q: We are preparing for a change of our domain name:
- abc.foobar.com -> foobar.net
-
- What are the tricks and caveats we should be aware of ?
-
- A: The forward zones are easy and there are a number of ways to do it.
- One way is the following:
-
- Have a single db file for the 2 domains, and have a single machine
- be the primary server for both abc.foobar.com and foobar.net.
-
- To resolve the host foo in both domains, use a single zone file which
- merely uses this for the host:
-
- foo IN A 1.2.3.4
-
- Use a "@" wherever the domain would be used ie for the SOA:
-
- @ IN SOA (...
-
- Then use this pair of lines in your named.boot:
-
- primary abc.foobar.com db.foobar
- primary foobar.net db.foobar
-
- The reverse zones should either contain PTRs to both names,
- or to whichever name you believe to be canonical currently.
-
- -------------------------------
-
- Date: Fri Apr 28 13:52:20 EDT 1995
- Subject: Q1.9 - How memory and CPU does DNS use ?
-
- Q: How much memory and CPU does DNS use ?
-
- A: It can use quite a bit ! The main thing that BIND needs is memory.
- It uses very little CPU or network bandwidth. The main
- considerations to keep in mind when planning are:
-
- 1) How many zones do you have and how large are they ?
- 2) How many clients do you expect to serve and how active are they ?
-
- As an example, here is a snapshot of memory usage from CSIRO Division
- of Mathematics and Statistics, Australia
-
- Named takes several days to stabalize its memory usage.
-
- Our main server stabalises at ~10Mb. It takes about 3 days to
- reach this size from 6 M at startup. This is under Sun OS 4.1.3U1.
-
- As another example, here is the configuration of ns.uu.net (from late
- 1994):
-
- ns.uu.net only does nameservice. It is running a version of BIND
- 4.9.3 on a Sun Classic with 96 MB of RAM, 220 MB of swap (remember
- that Sun OS will reserve swap for each fork, even if it is not needed)
- running Sun OS 4.1.3_U1.
-
- Joseph Malcolm, of Alternet, states that named generally hovers at
- 5-10% of the CPU, except after a reload, when it eats it all. He
- also states that if you are interested in the network connectivity
- around the system (ns.uu.net is located off of Falls-Church4), a
- PostScript map is available for anonymous ftp from
-
- ftp://ftp.uu.net/uunet-info/alternet.map.ps
-
-
- -------------------------------
-
- Date: Mon Jan 2 14:24:51 EST 1995
- Subject: Q1.10 - Other things to consider when planning your servers
-
- When making the plans to set up your servers, you may want to also
- consider the following issues:
-
- A) Server O/S limitations/capacities (which tend to be widely
- divergent from vendor to vendor)
- B) Client resolver behavior (even more widely divergent)
- C) Expected query response time
- D) Redundancy
- E) Desired speed of change propagation
- F) Network bandwidth availability
- G) Number of zones/subdomain-levels desired
- H) Richness of data stored (redundant MX records? HINFO records?)
- I) Ease of administration desired
- J) Network topology (impacts reverse-zone volume)
-
- Assuming a best-possible case for the factors above, particularly (A), (B),
- (C), (F), (G) & (H), it would be possible to run a 1000-node domain
- using a single lowly 25 or 40 MHz 386 PC with a fairly modest amount of RAM
- by today's standards, e.g. 4 or 8 Meg. However, this configuration would
- be slow, unreliable, and would provide no functionality beyond your basic
- address-to-name and name-to-address mappings.
-
- Beyond that baseline case, depending on what factors listed above,
- you may want look at other strategies, such splitting up the DNS
- traffic among several machines strategically located, possibly larger ones,
- and/or subdividing your domain itself. There are many options, tradeoffs,
- and DNS architectural paradigms from which to choose.
-
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Mon Jan 2 13:03:53 EST 1995
- Subject: Q1.11 - Proper way to get NS and reverse IP records into DNS
-
-
- Q: Reverse domain registration is separate from forward domain registration.
- How do I get it updated ?
-
- A: Blocks of network addresses have been delegated by the InterNIC. Check
- if your network a.b.c.0 is in such a block by using nslookup:
-
- nslookup -type=soa c.b.a.in-addr.arpa.
- nslookup -type=soa b.a.in-addr.arpa.
- nslookup -type=soa a.in-addr.arpa.
-
- One of the above should give you the information you are looking for
- (the others will return with an error something like `*** No start of
- authority (SOA) records available for ...')
- This will give you the email address of the person to whom you should
- address your change request.
-
- If none of these works, your network probably has not been delegated
- by the InterNIC and you need to contact them directly.
-
- CIDR has meant that the registration is delegated, but registration
- of in-addr.arpa has always been separate from forward zones - and
- for good reason - in that the forward and reverse zones may have
- different policies, contents etc, may be served by a different set
- of nameservers, and exist at different times (usually only at point
- of creation). There isn't a one-to-one mapping between the two, so
- merging the registration would probably cause more problems than
- people forgetting/not-knowing that they had to register in-addr.arpa
- zones separately. For example, there are organizations that have
- hundreds of networks and two or more domains, with a sprinkling of
- machines from each network in each of the domains.
-
-
- -------------------------------
-
- Date: Mon Jan 2 13:08:38 EST 1995
- Subject: Q1.12 - How to get my address assigned from the NIC ?
-
-
- Q: Can anyone tell me how can I get the address from NIC? How many subnets
- will NIC give to me?
-
- A: You should probably ask your Internet provider to give you an address.
- These days, addresses are being distributed through the providers,
- so that they can assign adjacent blocks of addresses to sites that
- go through the same provider, to permit more efficient routing on
- the backbones.
-
- Unless you have thousands of hosts, you probably won't be able to get a
- class B these days. Instead, you can get a series of class C networks.
- Large requests will be queried, so be ready to provide a network plan if
- you ask for more than 16 class C networks.
-
- If you can't do this through your Internet provider, you can look for a
- subnet registration form on rs.internic.net. See the answer in this FAQ
- to the question "How to register a domain name" for a URL to these
- forms.
-
- -------------------------------
-
- Date: Sun May 5 23:02:49 EDT 1996
- Subject: Q1.13 -Is there a block of private IP addresses I can use?
-
-
- Q: Is there a block of private IP addresses I can use?
-
- A: Yes there is. Please refer to RFC 1918:
-
- 1918 Address Allocation for Private Internets. Y. Rekhter, B.
- Moskowitz, D. Karrenberg, G. de Groot, & E. Lear. February 1996.
- (Format: TXT=22270 bytes)
-
- RFC 1918 documents the allocation of the following addresses for use
- by ``private internets'':
-
- 10.0.0.0 - 10.255.255.255
- 172.16.0.0 - 172.31.255.255
- 192.168.0.0 - 192.168.255.255
-
-
-
- -------------------------------
-
- Date: Mon Jan 2 13:55:50 EST 1995
- Subject: Q1.14 - Cache failed lookups
-
- Q: Does BIND cache negative answers (failed DNS lookups) ?
-
- A: Yes, BIND 4.9.3 will cache negative answers.
-
-
- -------------------------------
-
- Date: Wed Sep 4 22:52:18 EDT 1996
- Subject: Q1.15 - What does an NS record really do ?
-
- Q: What does a NS record really do ?
-
- A: The NS records in your zone data file pointing to the zone's name
- servers (as opposed to the servers of delegated subdomains) don't do
- much. They're essentially unused, though they are returned in the
- authority section of reply packets from your name servers.
-
- However, the NS records in the zone file of the parent domain are used
- to find the right servers to query for the zone in question. These
- records are more important than the records in the zone itself.
-
-
- -------------------------------
-
- Date: Fri Feb 10 15:40:10 EST 1995
- Subject: Q1.16 - DNS ports
-
- Q: Does anyone out there have any information/experience on exactly which
- TCP/UDP ports DNS uses to send and receive queries ?
-
- A: Use the following chart:
-
- Prot Src Dst Use
- udp 53 53 Queries between servers (eg, recursive queries)
- Replies to above
- tcp 53 53 Queries with long replies between servers, zone
- transfers Replies to above
- udp >1023 53 Client queries (sendmail, nslookup, etc ...)
- udp 53 >1023 Replies to above
- tcp >1023 53 Client queries with long replies
- tcp 53 >1023 Replies to above
-
- Note: >1023 is for non-priv ports on Un*x clients. On other client
- types, the limit may be more or less.
-
- Another point to keep in mind when designing filters for DNS is that a
- DNS server uses port 53 both as the source and destination for it's
- queries. So, a client queries an initial server from an unreserved
- port number to UDP port 53. If the server needs to query another
- server to get the required info, it sends a UDP query to that server
- with both source and destination ports set to 53. The response is then
- sent with the same src=53 dest=53 to the first server which then
- responds to the original client from port 53 to the original source
- port number.
-
- The point of all this is that putting in filters to only allow UDP
- between a high port and port 53 will not work correctly, you must also
- allow the port 53 to port 53 UDP to get through.
-
- Also, ALL versions of BIND use TCP for queries in some cases. The
- original query is tried using UDP. If the response is longer than
- the allocated buffer, the resolver will retry the query using a TCP
- connection. If you block access to TCP port 53 as suggested above,
- you may find that some things don't work.
-
- Newer version of BIND allow you to configure a list of IP addresses
- from which to allow zone transfers. This mechanism can be used to
- prevent people from outside downloading your entire namespace.
-
-
- -------------------------------
-
-
- Date: Wed Sep 4 22:51:42 EDT 1996
- Subject: Q1.17 - Obtaining the latest cache file
-
- Q: What is the cache file and where can I obtain the latest version ?
-
- A: From the "Name Server Operations Guide"
-
- 6.3. Cache Initialization
-
- 6.3.1. root.cache
-
- The name server needs to know the servers that
- are the authoritative name servers for the root
- domain of the network. To do this we have to prime
- the name server's cache with the addresses of these
- higher authorities. The location of this file is
- specified in the boot file. ...
-
- A copy of the comments in the file available from the InterNIC follow:
-
- ; This file holds the information on root name servers needed to
- ; initialize cache of Internet domain name servers
- ; (e.g. reference this file in the "cache . <file>"
- ; configuration file of BIND domain name servers).
- ;
- ; This file is made available by InterNIC registration services
- ; under anonymous FTP as
- ; file /domain/named.root
- ; on server FTP.RS.INTERNIC.NET
- ; -OR- under Gopher at RS.INTERNIC.NET
- ; under menu InterNIC Registration Services (NSI)
- ; submenu InterNIC Registration Archives
- ; file named.root
- ;
- ; last update: Oct 5, 1994
- ; related version of root zone: 1994100500
- ;
-
- If you have a version of dig running, you may obtain the information with
- the command
-
- dig @a.root-servers.net. . ns
-
-
- -------------------------------
-
- Date: Mon Aug 5 22:54:11 EDT 1996
- Subject: Q1.18 - Selecting a nameserver/root cache
-
- Q: Exactly how is the a root server selected from the root cache? Does the
- resolver attempt to pick the closest host or is it random or is it via
- sortlist-type workings? I assume that if the root server selected is not
- available (for whatever reason), the query fails instead of attempting
- another root server in the list -- or is that not true?
-
- A: Every recursive BIND name server (that is, one which is willing to go
- out and find something for you if you ask it something it doesn't
- know) will remember the measured round trip time to each server it
- sends queries to. If it has a choice of several servers for some
- domain (like "." for example) it will use the one whose measured RTT
- is lowest.
-
- Since the measured RTT of all NS RRs starts at zero (0), every one gets
- tried one time. Once all have responded, all RTT's will be nonzero, and
- the "fastest server" will get all queries henceforth, until it slows down
- for some reason.
-
- To promote dispersion and good recordkeeping, BIND will penalize the RTT
- by a little bit each time a server is reused, and it will penalize the RTT
- a _lot_ if it ever has to retransmit a query. For a server to stay "#1",
- it has to keep on answering quickly and consistently.
-
- Note that this is something BIND does that the DNS Specification does not
- mention at all. So other servers, those not based on BIND, might behave
- very differently.
-
-
- -------------------------------
-
- Date: Sun Jun 2 11:23:49 EDT 1996
- Subject: Q1.19 - InterNIC and domain names
-
-
- Q: What is the present InterNIC policy on what to do if someone wants to
- use a domain name that is already in use ?
-
- A: Please reference the current policy at
-
- ftp://rs.internic.net/policy/internic/internic-domain-4.txt
- http://rs.internic.net/domain-info/internic-domain-4.html
-
- The following information was submitted by Carl Oppedahl
- <oppedahl@patents.com>:
-
- If the jealous party happens to have a trademark registration, it
- is quite likely that the domain name owner will lose the domain
- name, even if they aren't infringing the trademark. This presents
- a substantial risk of loss of a domain name on only 30 days'
- notice. Anyone who is the manager of an Internet-connected site
- should be aware of this risk and should plan for it.
-
- See "How do I protect myself from loss of my domain name?" at
- http://www.patents.com/weblaw.sht#domloss .
-
- For an example of an ISP's battle to keep its domain name, see
- http://www.patents.com/nsi.sht .
-
- A compendium of information on the subject may be found at
- http://www.law.georgetown.edu/lc/internic/domain1.html .
-
-
- -------------------------------
-
- Date: Wed Sep 4 22:53:53 EDT 1996
- Subject: Q2.1 - Utilities to administer DNS zone files
-
- Q: I am wondering if there are utilities available to ease the
- administration of the zone files in the DNS.
-
- A: There are a few. Two common ones are h2n and makezones. Both are perl
- scripts. h2n is used to convert host tables into zone data files. It
- is available for anonymous ftp from
-
- ftp://ftp.uu.net/published/oreilly/nutshell/dnsbind/dns.tar.Z.
-
- makezones works from a single file that looks like a forward zone file,
- with some additional syntax for special cases. It is included in the
- current BIND distribution. The newest version is always available for
- anonymous ftp from
-
- ftp://ftp.cus.cam.ac.uk/pub/software/programs/DNS/makezones
-
- More information may be found using the DNS Resources Directory
-
- http://www.dns.net/dnsrd/
-
-
- -------------------------------
-
- Date: Thu Dec 1 11:09:11 EST 1994
- Subject: Q2.2 - DIG - Domain Internet Groper
-
- Q: Where can I find the latest version of DIG ?
-
- A: The latest and greatest, official, accept-no-substitutes version of DiG
- is the one that comes with BIND. Get the latest kit.
-
- -------------------------------
-
- Date: Wed Sep 4 23:43:57 EDT 1996
- Subject: Q2.3 -DNS packet analyser
-
- Q: I'm looking for a Ethernet packet analyser of public domain or standard
- (like tcpdump, snoop, packetman) that is able to determine DNS data
- field protocol
-
- A: There is a free ethernet analyser called Ethload available for PC's
- running DOS. The latest filename is ETHLD104.ZIP. It understands lots
- of protocols including TCP/UDP. It'll look inside there and display
- DNS/BOOTP/ICMP packets etc. (Ed. note: something nice for someone to
- add to tcpdump ;^) ). Depending on the ethernet controller it's given
- it'll perform slightly differently. It handles NDIS/Novell/Packet
- drivers. It works best with Novell's promiscuous mode drivers.
- A SimTel mirror site should have the program available for anonymous
- ftp. One is
-
- ftp://ftp.coast.net/SimTel/msdos/lan/ethld104.zip
-
-
- -------------------------------
-
- Date: Sun Dec 4 21:15:38 EST 1994
- Subject: Q2.4 - host
-
- A section from the host man page:
-
- host looks for information about Internet hosts and domain
- names. It gets this information from a set of intercon-
- nected servers that are spread across the world. The infor-
- mation is stored in the form of "resource records" belonging
- to hierarchically organized "zones".
-
- By default, the program simply converts between host names
- and Internet addresses. However, with the -t, -a and -v
- options, it can be used to find all of the information about
- domain names that is maintained by the domain nameserver
- system. The information printed consists of various fields
- of the associated resource records that were retrieved.
-
- The arguments can be either host names (domain names) or
- numeric Internet addresses.
-
- 'host' is compatible with both BIND 4.9 and BIND 4.8
-
- 'host' may be found in contrib/host in the BIND distribution. The latest
- version always available for anonymous ftp from
-
- ftp://ftp.nikhef.nl/pub/network/host.tar.Z
-
- It may also be found for anonymous ftp from
-
- ftp://ftp.uu.net/networking/ip/dns/host.tar.Z
-
- -------------------------------
-
- Date: Fri Feb 10 15:25:11 EST 1995
- Subject: Q2.5 - Programming with DNS
-
- Q: How can I use DNS information in my program?
-
- A: It depends on precisely what you want to do:
-
- a) Consider whether you need to write a program at all. It may well
- be easier to write a shell program (e.g. using awk or perl) to parse
- the output of dig, host or nslookup.
-
- b) If all you need is names and addresses, there will probably be
- system routines 'gethostbyname' and 'gethostbyaddr' to provide this
- information.
-
- c) If you need more details, then there are system routines (res_query
- and res_search) to assist with making and sending DNS queries.
- However, these do not include a routine to parse the resulting answer
- (although routines to assist in this task are provided). There is a
- separate library available that will take a DNS response and unpick
- it into its constituent parts, returning a C structure that can be
- used by the program. The source for this library is available for
- anonymous ftp from
-
- ftp://hpux.csc.liv.ac.uk/hpux/Networking/Admin/resparse-*
-
-
- -------------------------------
-
-
- Date: Wed May 3 12:46:50 EDT 1995
- Subject: Q2.6 - A source of information relating to DNS
-
- Q: Where can I find utilities and tools to help me manage my zone files ?
-
- A: There are several tools available. Please refer to the "tools" section
- of the DNS resources directory:
-
- http://www.dns.net/dnsrd/tools.html
-
-
- -------------------------------
-
-
- Date: Mon Aug 5 22:49:46 EDT 1996
- Subject: Q3.1 - TCP/IP Host Naming Conventions
-
- Q: Is a guide available relating to naming systems ?
-
- A: One guide/resource is RFC 1178, "Choosing a Name for Your Computer",
- which is available via anonymous FTP from
-
- ftp://ftp.internic.net/rfc/rfc1178.txt
-
- RFCs (Request For Comments) are specifications and guidelines for how
- many aspects of TCP/IP and the Internet (should) work. Most RFCs are
- fairly technical documents, and some have semantics that are hotly
- contested in the newsgroups. But a few, like RFC 1178, are actually
- good to read for someone who's just starting along a TCP/IP path.
-
-
- -------------------------------
-
- Date: Thu Dec 1 10:32:43 EST 1994
- Subject: Q3.2 - What are slaves and forwarders ?
-
- Q: What are slaves and forwarders ?
-
- A: "forwarders" is a list of NS records that are _prepended_ to a list
- of NS records to query if the data is not available locally. This
- allows a rich cache of records to be built up at a centralized
- location. This is good for sites that have sporadic or very slow
- connections to the Internet. (demand dial-up, for example) It's
- also just a good idea for very large distributed sites to increase
- the chance that you don't have to go off to the Internet to get an
- IP address. (sometimes for addresses across the street!)
-
- "slave" modifies this to say to replace the list of NS records
- with the forwarders entry, instead of prepending to it. This is
- for firewalled environments, where the nameserver can't directly
- get out to the Internet at all.
-
- "slave" is meaningless (and invalid, in late-model BINDs) without
- "forwarders". "forwarders" is an entry in named.boot, and therefore
- applies only to the nameserver (not to resolvers).
-
- -------------------------------
-
- Date: Mon Jan 2 13:15:13 EST 1995
- Subject: Q3.3 - When is a server authoritative?
-
-
- Q: What criteria does a server use to determine if it is authoritative
- for a domain?
-
- A: In the case of BIND:
- 1) The server contains current data in files for the zone in
- question (Data must be current for secondaries, as defined
- in the SOA)
- 2) The server is told that it is authoritative for the zone, by
- a 'primary' or 'secondary' keyword in /etc/named.boot.
- 3) The server does an error-free load of the zone.
-
- Q: I have set up a DNS where there is an SOA record for
- the domain, but the server still does not consider itself
- authoritative. (I used nslookup and set server=the correct machine.)
- It seems to me that something is not matching up somewhere. I suspect
- that this is because the service provider has not given us control
- over the IP numbers in our own domain, and so while the machine listed
- has an A record for an address, there is no corresponding PTR record.
-
- A: That's possible too, but is unrelated to the first question.
- You need to be delegated a zone before outside people will start
- talking to your server. However, a server can still be authoritative
- for a zone even though it hasn't been delegated authority (it's just
- that only the people who use that as their server will see the data).
-
- A server may consider itself non-authoritative even though it's a
- primary if there is a syntax error in the zone (see point 3 above).
-
- Q: I always believe that it was the NS record that defined authoritative
- servers.
-
- A: Nope, delegation is a separate issue from authoritativeness.
- You can still be authoritative, but not delegated. (you can also be
- delegated, but not authoritative -- that's a "lame delegation")
-
- Q: We have had problems in the past from servers that were
- authoritative (primary or secondary) but no NS, so other thought they
- were not. Some resolvers get very confused when they get non-
- authoritative data from the primary server.
-
- A: Yes, that's a lame delegation. That's not caused by what you said,
- but rather by a server which is _not_ authoritative for a zone, yet
- someone else (the parent) is saying that a server is authoritative
- (via the NS records).
-
- The set of NS records in the parent zone must be a subset of the
- authoritative servers to avoid lame delegations.
-
-
- -------------------------------
-
- Date: Mon Aug 5 22:39:02 EDT 1996
- Subject: Q3.4 - underscore in host-/domainnames
-
-
- Q: I had a quick look on whether underscores are allowed in host- or
- domainnames.
-
- RFC 1033 allows them.
- RFC 1035 doesn't.
- RFC 1123 doesn't.
- dnswalk complains about them.
-
- Which RFC is the final authority these days?
-
- A: Actually RFC 1035 deals with names of machines or names of
- mail domains. i.e "_" is not permitted in a hostname or on the
- RHS of the "@" in local@domain.
-
- Underscore is permitted where ever the domain is NOT one of
- these types of addresses.
-
- In general the DNS mostly contains hostnames and mail domainnames.
- This will change as new resource record types for authenticating DNS
- queries start to appear.
-
- The latest version of 'host' checks for illegal characters in A/MX
- record names and the NS/MX target names.
-
- After saying all of that, remember that RFC 1123 is a Required Internet
- Standard (per RFC 1720), and RFC 1033 isn't. Even 1035 isn't a required
- standard. Therefore, RFC 1123 wins, no contest.
-
- From RFC1123, Section 2.1
-
- 2.1 Host Names and Numbers
-
- The syntax of a legal Internet host name was specified in RFC-952
- [DNS:4]. One aspect of host name syntax is hereby changed: the
- restriction on the first character is relaxed to allow either a
- letter or a digit. Host software MUST support this more liberal
- syntax.
-
- And described by Dave Barr in RFC1912:
-
- Allowable characters in a label for a host name are only ASCII
- letters, digits, and the `-' character. Labels may not be all
- numbers, but may have a leading digit (e.g., 3com.com). Labels must
- end and begin only with a letter or digit. See [RFC 1035] and [RFC
- 1123]. (Labels were initially restricted in [RFC 1035] to start with
- a letter, and some older hosts still reportedly have problems with
- the relaxation in [RFC 1123].) Note there are some Internet
- hostnames which violate this rule (411.org, 1776.com).
-
- Finally, one more piece of information (From Paul Vixie):
-
- RFC 1034 says only that domain names have characters in them, though it
- says so with enough fancy and indirection that it's hard to tell exactly.
-
- Generally, for second level domains (i.e., something you would get from
- InterNIC or from the US Domain Registrar and probably other ISO 3166
- country code TLDs), RFC 952 is thought to apply. RFC 952 was about host
- names rather than domain names, but the rules seemed good enough.
-
- <domainname> ::= <hname>
-
- <hname> ::= <name>*["."<name>]
- <name> ::= <let>[*[<let-or-digit-or-hyphen>]<let-or-digit>]
-
- There has been a recent update on this subject which may be found in
- ftp://ftp.internic.net/internet-drafts/draft-andrews-dns-hostnames-02.txt.
-
-
- -------------------------------
-
- Date: Mon Aug 5 22:45:02 EDT 1996
- Subject: Q3.5 - Lame delegation
-
- Q: What is lame delegation ?
-
- A: Two things are required for a lame delegation:
- 1) A nameserver X is delegated as authoritative for a zone.
- 2) Nameserver X is not performing nameservice for that zone.
-
- Try to think of a lame delegation as a long-term condition, brought
- about by a misconfiguration somewhere. Bryan Beecher's 1992 LISA
- paper on lame delegations is good to read on this. The problem
- really lies in misconfigured nameservers, not "lameness" brought
- about by transient outages. The latter is common on the Internet
- and hard to avoid, while the former is correctable.
-
- In order to be performing nameservice for a zone, it must have
- (presumed correct) data for that zone, and it must be answering
- authoritatively to resolver queries for that zone. (The AA bit is
- set in the flags section)
-
- The "classic" lame delegation case is when nameserver X is delegated
- as authoritative for domain Y, yet when you ask Y about X, it
- returns non-authoritative data.
-
- Here's an example that shows what happens most often (using dig,
- dnswalk, and doc to find).
-
- Let's say the domain bogus.com gets registered at the NIC and they
- have listed 2 primary name servers, both from their *upstream*
- provider:
-
- bogus.com IN NS ns.bogus.com
- bogus.com IN NS upstream.com
- bogus.com IN NS upstream1.com
-
- So the root servers have this info. But when the admins at
- bogus.com actually set up their zone files they put something like:
-
- bogus.com IN NS upstream.com
- bogus.com IN NS upstream1.com
-
- So your name server may have the nameserver info cached (which it
- may have gotten from the root). The root says "go ask ns.bogus.com"
- since they are authoritative
-
- This is usually from stuff being registered at the NIC (either
- nic.ddn.mil or rs.internic.net), and then updated later, but the
- folks who make the updates later never let the folks at the NIC know
- about it.
-
- Q: How can I see if the server is "lame" ?
-
- A: Go to the authoritative servers one level up, and ask them who
- they think is authoritative, and then go ask each one of those
- delegees if they think that they themselves are authoritative. If any
- responds "no", then you know who the lame delegation is, and who is
- delegating lamely to them. You can then send off a message to the
- administrators of the level above.
-
- The 'lamers' script from Byran Beecher really takes care of all this
- for you. It parses the lame delegation notices from BIND's syslog
- and summarizes them for you. It may be found in the contrib section
- of the latest BIND distribution. The latest version is available
- for anonymous ftp from
-
- ftp://terminator.cc.umich.edu/dns/lame-delegations/
-
- If you want to actively check for lame delegations, you can use 'doc'
- and 'dnswalk'. You can check things manually with 'dig'.
-
- A: The InterNIC recently announced a new lame delegation that will be in
- effect on 01 October, 1996. Here is a summary:
-
- 1) After receipt/processing of a name registration template, and at
- random intervals thereafter, the InterNIC will perform a DNS query
- via UDP Port 53 on domain names for an SOA response for the name
- being registered.
-
- 2) If the query of the domain name returns a non-authoritative
- response from all the listed name servers, the query will be
- repeated four times over the next 30 days at random intervals
- approximately 7 days apart, with notification to all listed
- whois and nameserver contacts of the possible pending
- deletion. If at least one server answers correctly, but one
- or more are lame, FYI notifications will be sent to all
- contacts and checking will be discontinued. Additionally,
- e-mail notices will be provided to the contact for the name
- servers holding the delegation to alert them to the "lame"
- condition. Notifications will state explicitly the
- consequences of not correcting the "lame" condition and will
- be assigned a descriptive subject as follows:
-
- Subject: Lame Delegation Notice: DOMAIN_NAME
-
- The notification will include a timestamp for when the query
- was performed.
-
- 3) If, following 30 days, the name servers still provide no SOA
- response, the name will be placed in a "hold" status and the
- DNS information will no longer be propagated. The
- administrative contact will be notified by postal mail and all
- whois contacts will be notified by e-mail, with instructions
- for taking corrective action.
-
- 4) Following 60 days in a "hold" status, the name will be deleted
- and made available for reregistration. Notification of the final
- deletion will be sent to the name server and domain name contacts
- listed in the NIC database.
-
-
- -------------------------------
-
- Date: Thu Dec 1 11:10:39 EST 1994
- Subject: Q3.6 - What does opt-class field do?
-
- Q: Just something I was wondering about: What does the opt-class
- field in an name database do (the one that always says IN)?
- What would happen if I put something else there instead?
-
- A: This field is the address class. From the BOG -
-
- ...is the address class; currently, only one class
- is supported: IN for internet addresses and other
- internet information. Limited support is included for
- the HS class, which is for MIT/Athena ``Hesiod''
- information.
-
- -------------------------------
-
- Date: Fri Jul 5 23:49:55 EDT 1996
- Subject: Q3.7 - Top level domains
-
-
- A section from RFC 1591:
-
- 2. The Top Level Structure of the Domain Names
-
- In the Domain Name System (DNS) naming of computers there is a
- hierarchy of names. The root of system is unnamed. There are a set
- of what are called "top-level domain names" (TLDs). These are the
- generic TLDs (EDU, COM, NET, ORG, GOV, MIL, and INT), and the two
- letter country codes from ISO-3166. It is extremely unlikely that
- any other TLDs will be created.
-
- [ Ed note: the ISO-3166 country codes may be found for anonymous ftp from:
-
- ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/iana/assignments/country-codes
- ftp://ftp.ripe.net/iso3166-codes
- ]
-
- [ Ed note: Since the Internic started charging for registration services,
- (and for other reasons) there are a number of groups that want to offer
- an alternative to registering a domain under a "standard" TLD. More
- information on some of these options may be found at:
-
- http://www.alternic.net/
- http://www.eu.org/
- http://www.ml.org/mljoin.html
-
- Additional note:
-
- From: Michael Dillon <michael@memra.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Jul 96 17:21 PDT
-
- IANA (Internet Assigned Numbers Authority) is currently responsible for
- delegating the top level domains used in URL's, i.e. .COM, .ORG,
- etc. Currently under consideration is a plan that would see new
- international Top Level Domains created and new commercial registries (not
- the Internic) to manage those domains. Most of the discussion is happening
- on a mailing list at newdom@iiia.org which you can subscribe to by sending
-
- subscribe
-
- to newdom-request@iiia.org or you can review the discussions to date at
- http://www.iiia.org/lists/newdom/ especially the recent discussions. Over
- the past 9 months we have come up with one main proposal that appears as
- if it will be the core of an RFC. This is available at
- ftp://ietf.cnri.reston.va.us/internet-drafts/
- draft-postel-iana-itld-admin-01.txt
- There are a couple of other proposals also being discussed on the list.
-
- Jon Postel will shortly be posting a revised draft of his proposal in
- light of discussions that took place at the Montreal IETF meeting. Also,
- there is information from the dissenting camp available at
- http://www.alternic.nic
- For most of you, that domain name will be unreachable and you will need to
- use http://www.alternic.net to reach it.
-
- The plan is to have this system in place by year end and be registering
- new domains by early 1997. You may soon see URL's like
- http://www.industrial.plastics or http://www.spock.klingon appearing in a
- magazine near you. If you want to have any input into this proceeding, now
- is the time to speak up.
-
- Please forward this to any colleagues who may wish to have input into
- these decisions.
-
- Michael Dillon ISP & Internet Consulting
- Memra Software Inc. Fax: +1-604-546-3049
- http://www.memra.com E-mail: michael@memra.com
-
- ]
-
- Under each TLD may be created a hierarchy of names. Generally, under
- the generic TLDs the structure is very flat. That is, many
- organizations are registered directly under the TLD, and any further
- structure is up to the individual organizations.
-
- In the country TLDs, there is a wide variation in the structure, in
- some countries the structure is very flat, in others there is
- substantial structural organization. In some country domains the
- second levels are generic categories (such as, AC, CO, GO, and RE),
- in others they are based on political geography, and in still others,
- organization names are listed directly under the country code. The
- organization for the US country domain is described in RFC 1480.
-
- Each of the generic TLDs was created for a general category of
- organizations. The country code domains (for example, FR, NL, KR,
- US) are each organized by an administrator for that country. These
- administrators may further delegate the management of portions of the
- naming tree. These administrators are performing a public service on
- behalf of the Internet community. Descriptions of the generic
- domains and the US country domain follow.
-
- Of these generic domains, five are international in nature, and two
- are restricted to use by entities in the United States.
-
- World Wide Generic Domains:
-
- COM - This domain is intended for commercial entities, that is
- companies. This domain has grown very large and there is
- concern about the administrative load and system performance if
- the current growth pattern is continued. Consideration is
- being taken to subdivide the COM domain and only allow future
- commercial registrations in the subdomains.
-
- EDU - This domain was originally intended for all educational
- institutions. Many Universities, colleges, schools,
- educational service organizations, and educational consortia
- have registered here. More recently a decision has been taken
- to limit further registrations to 4 year colleges and
- universities. Schools and 2-year colleges will be registered
- in the country domains (see US Domain, especially K12 and CC,
- below).
-
- NET - This domain is intended to hold only the computers of network
- providers, that is the NIC and NOC computers, the
- administrative computers, and the network node computers. The
- customers of the network provider would have domain names of
- their own (not in the NET TLD).
-
- ORG - This domain is intended as the miscellaneous TLD for
- organizations that didn't fit anywhere else. Some non-
- government organizations may fit here.
-
- INT - This domain is for organizations established by international
- treaties, or international databases.
-
- United States Only Generic Domains:
-
- GOV - This domain was originally intended for any kind of government
- office or agency. More recently a decision was taken to
- register only agencies of the US Federal government in this
- domain. State and local agencies are registered in the country
- domains (see US Domain, below).
-
- MIL - This domain is used by the US military.
-
- Example country code Domain:
-
- US - As an example of a country domain, the US domain provides for
- the registration of all kinds of entities in the United States
- on the basis of political geography, that is, a hierarchy of
- <entity-name>.<locality>.<state-code>.US. For example,
- "IBM.Armonk.NY.US". In addition, branches of the US domain are
- provided within each state for schools (K12), community
- colleges (CC), technical schools (TEC), state government
- agencies (STATE), councils of governments (COG),libraries
- (LIB), museums (MUS), and several other generic types of
- entities (see RFC 1480 for details).
-
-
- A section from RFC 1480:
-
- 2. NAMING STRUCTURE
-
- The US Domain hierarchy is based on political geography. The
- basic name space under US is the state name space, then the
- "locality" name space, (like a city, or county) then
- organization or computer name and so on.
-
- For example:
-
- BERKELEY.CA.US
- PORTLAND.WA.US
-
- There is of course no problem with running out of names.
-
- The things that are named are individual computers.
-
- If you register now in one city and then move, the database can
- be updated with a new name in your new city, and a pointer can
- be set up from your old name to your new name. This type of
- pointer is called a CNAME record.
-
- The use of unregistered names is not effective and causes problems
- for other users. Inventing your own name and using it without
- registering is not a good idea.
-
- In addition to strictly geographically names, some special names
- are used, such as FED, STATE, AGENCY, DISTRICT, K12, LIB, CC,
- CITY, and COUNTY. Several new name spaces have been created,
- DNI, GEN, and TEC, and a minor change under the "locality" name
- space was made to the existing CITY and COUNTY subdomains by
- abbreviating them to CI and CO. A detailed description
- follows.
-
- Below US, Parallel to States:
- -----------------------------
-
- "FED" - This branch may be used for agencies of the federal
- government. For example: <org-name>.<city>.FED.US
-
- "DNI" - DISTRIBUTED NATIONAL INSTITUTES - The "DNI" branch was
- created directly under the top-level US. This branch is to be used
- for distributed national institutes; organizations that span state,
- regional, and other organizational boundaries; that are national in
- scope, and have distributed facilities. For example:
- <org-name>.DNI.US.
-
- Name Space Within States:
- ------------------------
-
- "locality" - cities, counties, parishes, and townships. Subdomains
- under the "locality" would be like CI.<city>.<state>.US,
- CO.<county>.<state>.US, or businesses. For example:
- Petville.Marvista.CA.US.
-
- "CI" - This branch is used for city government agencies and is a
- subdomain under the "locality" name (like Los Angeles). For example:
- Fire-Dept.CI.Los-Angeles.CA.US.
-
- "CO" - This branch is used for county government agencies and is a
- subdomain under the "locality" name (like Los Angeles). For example:
- Fire-Dept.CO.San-Diego.CA.US.
-
- "K12" - This branch may be used for public school districts. A
- special name "PVT" can be used in the place of a school district name
- for private schools. For example: <school-name>.K12.<state>.US and
- <school-name>.PVT.K12.<state>.US.
-
- "CC" - COMMUNITY COLLEGES - This branch was established for all state
- wide community colleges. For example: <school-name>.CC.<state>.US.
-
- "TEC" - TECHNICAL AND VOCATIONAL SCHOOLS - The branch "TEC" was
- established for technical and vocational schools and colleges. For
- example: <school-name>.TEC.<state>.US.
-
- "LIB" - LIBRARIES (STATE, REGIONAL, CITY, COUNTY) - This branch may
- be used for libraries only. For example: <lib-name>.LIB.<state>.US.
-
- "STATE" - This branch may be used for state government agencies. For
- example: <org-name>.STATE.<state>.US.
-
- "GEN" - GENERAL INDEPENDENT ENTITY - This branch is for the things
- that don't fit easily into any other structure listed -- things that
- might fit in to something like ORG at the top-level. It is best not
- to use the same keywords (ORG, EDU, COM, etc.) that are used at the
- top-level to avoid confusion. GEN would be used for such things as,
- state-wide organizations, clubs, or domain parks. For example:
- <org-name>.GEN.<state-code>.US.
-
- The application form for the US domain may be found for anonymous ftp
- from:
-
- ftp://internic.net/templates/us-domain-template.txt
-
- The application form for the EDU, COM, NET, ORG, and GOV domains may be
- found for anonymous ftp from:
-
- ftp://internic.net/templates/domain-template.txt
-
-
- -------------------------------
-
- Date: Wed Sep 4 22:59:27 EDT 1996
- Subject: Q3.8 - Classes of networks
-
- Q: I am just kind of curious to what exactly the differences in classes
- of networks are (class A, B, C).
-
- A: The usage of 'classes of networks' are historical and have been replaced
- by CIDR blocks on the Internet. That being said...
-
- An Internet Protocol (IP) address is 32 bit in length, divided into
- two or three parts (the network address, the subnet address (if present),
- and the host address. The subnet addresses are only present if the
- network has been divided into subnetworks. The length of the network,
- subnet, and host field are all variable.
-
- There are five different network classes. The leftmost bits indicate
- the class of the network.
-
- # of # of
- bits in bits in
- network host
- Class field field Internet Protocol address in binary Ranges
- ============================================================================
- A 7 24 0NNNNNNN.HHHHHHHH.HHHHHHHH.HHHHHHHH 1-127.x.x.x
- B 14 16 10NNNNNN.NNNNNNNN.HHHHHHHH.HHHHHHHH 128-191.x.x.x
- C 22 8 110NNNNN.NNNNNNNN.NNNNNNNN.HHHHHHHH 192-223.x.x.x
- D NOTE 1 1110xxxx.xxxxxxxx.xxxxxxxx.xxxxxxxx 224-239.x.x.x
- E NOTE 2 11110xxx.xxxxxxxx.xxxxxxxx.xxxxxxxx 240-247.x.x.x
-
- where N represents part of the network address and H represents part of
- the host address. When the subnet address is defined, the needed bits
- are assigned from the host address space.
-
- NOTE 1: Reserved for multicast groups - RFC 1112
- NOTE 2: Reserved for future use
-
- 127.0.0.1 is reserved for local loopback.
-
-
- -------------------------------
-
-
- Date: Fri Apr 28 13:31:24 EDT 1995
- Subject: Q3.9 - What is CIDR ?
-
- Q: What is CIDR ?
-
- A: CIDR is "Classless Inter-Domain Routing (CIDR). From RFC1517:
-
- ...Classless Inter-Domain Routing (CIDR) attempts to deal with
- these problems by defining a mechanism to slow the growth of
- routing tables and reduce the need to allocate new IP network
- numbers.
-
- Much more information may be obtained in RFCs 1467, 1517, 1518, 1520;
- with primary reference 1519
-
-
- -------------------------------
-
-
- Date: Fri Apr 28 13:31:24 EDT 1995
- Subject: Q3.10 - What is the rule for glue ?
-
- Q: What is the rule for glue ?
-
- A: A glue record is an A record for a name that appears on the right-hand
- side of a NS record. So, if you have this:
-
- sub.foobar.com. IN NS dns.sub.foobar.com.
- dns.sub.foobar.com. IN A 1.2.3.4
-
- then the second record is a glue record (for the NS record above it).
-
- You need glue records when -- and only when -- you are delegating
- authority to a nameserver that "lives" in the domain you are delegating
- *and* you aren't a secondary server for that domain.
-
- In other words, in the example above, you need to add an A record
- for dns.sub.foobar.com since it "lives" in the domain it serves.
- This boot strapping information is necessary: How are you supposed
- to find out the IP address of the nameserver for domain FOO if the
- nameserver for FOO "lives" in FOO?
-
- If you have this NS record:
-
- sub.foobar.com. IN NS dns.xyz123.com.
-
- you do NOT need a glue record, and, in fact, adding one is a very
- bad idea. If you add one, and then the folks at xyz123.com change
- the address, then you will be passing out incorrect data.
-
- Also, unless you actually have a machine called something.IN-ADDR.ARPA,
- you will never have any glue records present in any of your "reverse"
- files.
-
- There is also a sort of implicit glue record that can be useful (or
- confusing :^) ). If the parent server (abc.foobar.com domain in example
- above) is a secondary server for the child, then the A record will be
- fetched from the child server when the zone transfer is done. The glue
- is still there but it's a little different, it's in the ip address in
- the named.boot line instead of explicitly in the data. In this case
- you can leave out the explicit glue A record and leave the manually
- configured "glue" in just the one place in the named.boot file.
-
- RFC 1537 says it quite nicely:
-
- 2. Glue records
-
- Quite often, people put unnecessary glue (A) records in their
- zone files. Even worse is that I've even seen *wrong* glue records
- for an external host in a primary zone file! Glue records need only
- be in a zone file if the server host is within the zone and there
- is no A record for that host elsewhere in the zone file.
-
- Old BIND versions ("native" 4.8.3 and older versions) showed the
- problem that wrong glue records could enter secondary servers in
- a zone transfer.
-